[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]

/biz/ - Business & Finance

Search:


View post   

>> No.29460974 [View]
File: 156 KB, 1134x1248, EneoVeaWEAIHuxk.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
29460974

>>29459906
you're just bitter because Stacy chose Fido over you

>>29459269
i love sacred-texts.com! when i Make It i'm going to get that USB drive with all the world's religious texts on it because I've used their site way too much lol. i'm a little paranoid about doing Enochian workings because i'm still pretty amateur in my practice, doing Goetic or Enochian work at my level would be like trying to fly a F-16 after flying a Cessna a few times and I'm a little scared of opening that door. If I do I'll be real sure to be very thorough in my preparation and word choice, and banishing afterwards.

i think everyone who goes down this path struggles with some of the same things you describe in your post. as far as sigils go, I don't think you necessarily have to forget them entirely so much as just, like, not care about them, just release them into the universe and don't focus on them anymore, let them kinda work in the background. at least that's how i understand it. you charge them at the beginning and then leave them be. in terms of intention-setting...idk that's tough. it sounds like you're on the right path though, and you seem to be approaching it from a healthy angle. just remember you get out what you put in, both negative and positive.

thank you for teaching me the LBRP by the way, i'm genuinely going to try and use your method, maybe try and do it at least once a week. i appreciate it! thank you teacher

>>29459620
that makes me so fucking happy, you have no idea. the author is kind of a hero of mine- he's the guy who wrote the book on the occult architecture of Washington DC and popularized the meme about the pentagram and the owl in the street layout. Enjoy the book! It's a trip. the Way of the Fool, it's the only way to travel.

>>29459271
i get the sense that they are moving past testing the system and it is now being turned on, slowly and in stages...

>> No.29187594 [View]
File: 156 KB, 1134x1248, EneoVeaWEAIHuxk.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
29187594

>>29185645
my "to-buy" list:
more HBAR (currently 5k, want at least 10k)
QNT (would like to have at least 10, ideally 50)
Everest (because I know digital ID is going to be huge and they seem to have the partnerships to pursue this) (Civic/CVC too)
Energy Web Token (because carbon credits are going to be biiig business soon, trillions of $$- it does seem like kind of a token-not-needed situation though so I want to learn more about the tokenomics/use case)
XDC
IOTA
SOLO (though somebody else said Polymath for tokenized securities, and I read Mirror is good too)

also does anyone know how I can invest in tokenized properties and NFTs that are used for real-world use cases?

>> No.27554908 [View]
File: 156 KB, 1134x1248, EneoVeaWEAIHuxk.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
27554908

>>27554605
>investing based on intuition and gut instinct
based and going to make it. unironically going to buy a bag of CVC just because an anonymous internet person shared his schizo instinct with me. fuck doing TA or looking at whitepapers...we get our transmissions directly from the Great Magnet

>> No.25226009 [View]
File: 156 KB, 1134x1248, EneoVeaWEAIHuxk.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
25226009

>>25225874
to clarify, i have not received any communications from friends or family which included the word "bro"- I was paraphrasing, and in doing so, I inadvertantly slipped into my stoner-bro dialect, which I sometimes utilize in my less-formal communications. I forgot that in this particular venue, use of such vocabulary is verboten, and I promise not to make this particular faux pas again. Capice?

>>25225919
we're all mad here, fren

>> No.25182710 [View]
File: 156 KB, 1134x1248, EneoVeaWEAIHuxk.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
25182710

>>25181598
>https://twitter.com/nathanielpopper/status/1341500796836302849
i believe this is referring Santander Bank,
https://cointelegraph.com/news/why-santander-doesnt-want-to-use-ripple-for-international-payments-yet

Note the key word in that URL- "yet"

They are talking about On-Demand Liquidity, the part of Ripple's suite of technology that used XRP as an intermediary between currencies. In order for this technology to function as designed, an entity (like a bank, or a government, or a supranational organization) can't be operating on its own- it has to be part of a network.

(Theoretically, it can be operating on its own if, for example, it is present in both the country of origin and destination country and has holdings in both currencies- for example, Moneygram, who used Ripple's xRapid tech in its successful and profitable partnership with Ripple
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/moneygram-goes-live-xrapid-using-113942920.html))

Banco Santander helped Ripple develop its payment API. they are still partners. Santander just didn't want to start using ODL (i.e. the part of Ripple's tech that uses XRP) before the rest of the network. They are still closely linked and Santander will start using it when everybody else does (i.e. soon). I suspect you knew that already but posted this question to mislead normies. I hope you're getting paid for these posts, because the alternative is almost too depressing to imagine.

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]