/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>16261600
Nah he does look like what the statues depict him as but what he governs over is on multiple things. The reason the closest planet to the sun is named after Mercury is because it’s the quickest since the gravitational pull from the sun makes it revolve faster. What retrograde describes is how Mercury goes so fast that it appears it moves backwards. In this way, it is relative to him as schizos claim that whenever the planet is in retrograde, communication/trade/money/travel goes out of wack until the planet goes out of retrograde.

Is it memes, is it because it’s no one selling? Is it being heavily manipulated?

And why isn’t Sergey going to dump on us in the future? How about the corporations who’ll acquire 350 million or so as well? This coin has always boggled my mind and every time I find it more of a risk to bet it goes down than it is going up randomly.

I have traded for many years and have found this coin unusual as I can’t seem to predict how high it’s going to go. This is not a joke any anons can please answer my question? Unironically LINK might go 1000 EOY so any buy right now is a good investment.

>>13159997
Hello fren
I was going to throw 5k for RLC but my senses refrained

I checked the historical data and it looks like even at V2 it doesn’t make any significant change. I tend to see the pattern of it dump pretty hard after every major announcement / partnership.

Additionally I’m concerned about the tokenomics. Isn’t RLC just acting as middleware for decentralized computing power? Then what is the point of the coin besides staking? It seems as if the coin is unnecessary and causes unneeded frustrations.

Why should I buy RLC as a business, when
Thanks, whale bro