/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>10812345
but now you see I'm a different person than the "magic formula anon" you were talking about.
Be careful tho, because I've seen at least 2 other people using the "smoke and mirrors" phrase, but I believe I used it pretty often, yes. I'm not obsessed, I used to argue a lot about the on chain solvency, because debunking scams like bitconnect and other ponzi schemes was always interesting to me. Ever since they admited themselves that this shit doesn't really work I stopped engaging except jumping in every few months to see if anything's changes in bagholders' minds.

>>10812363
there is no way in hell this on chain solvency meme will ever work. I've discussed if back and forth with the most dedicated bagholders 6 monts ago. especially with freaking institutions being so risk averse. The only way this token could pump is if those arab scamels used some of their ico money to give bagholders a final exit pump to drop this shit.

I also screencaped some of the most juicy bagholders bingos in the making before it was cool. This is from freaking march
Everyone who was in their telegram at that time after they admited this ponzi won't work, remembers the shitshow. Especially retard Hans and his cocksucker s.o.yboy Max
I wonder if they are both still so smug as they were back then

>>10708395
>they aren't clear about how much will be backed by JNT
0

Guys STOP FUDDING, LEAVE JIBREL ALONE!
Max said it's time to 'CCUMULATE
I'm sure he's right, have some confidence for Fuck's Sake!