/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>12886090
JFC why is it all of the literal shitcoins that moon while it's the ones that actually sound like they have decent usecases that end up with the pants-on-head retarded dev teams?

I admit it. I got REQ'd. The only thing that's fucked me harder is ICX.

>Tfw people fell for the the fud
HAHAHA people literally sold by the dozens at the bottom

>why did my daughter choose to marry a moonboi
>they are always colossal fuckups, despite their money. No accomplishments to their name. No grit in their heart. No brain in their scull. No length to their peepees.
>At least she'll be able to divorce him profitably

>>12580431
Final fantasy tactics
>>12580404
I will lol. I just struggle with jobs. Most I've worked consecutively full time was 3 months.
My associate's is shit so far and don't want to finish the 1.5 more yrs for my bachelors until I am in a better spot. My brother is trying to hook me up to this one cuck consteuction job that at least starts at 15 an hr. He'll tell me today if I can get in.
Have to wait 1-3 months more for this electrical union. Pays well. 19.96 start and 44.35 cap in 3.5 yrs...
Everyone ik got in but I always feel like I fuck up interviews. It's funny cause Ik people that don't study for interviews and just wing it yet still get the jobs.

>>12569240
Jesus Christ the deck is even worse than I thought. I cannot wait to see what you did with the mountain of rotting diapers that you stuffed under the floorboards.

>>12442813
This coin broke me. I can't believe I fell for the meme. All I have to show for it is a stack of worthless digital funny money with a giant cartoon R plastered on the side.

On the plus side, my heart is now iron. Nothing crypto can do can hurt me anymore, not even a full crash to zero.

Okay, I'm starting to question the usefulness of turingcomplete smart contracts. We haven't seen anything useful come out of ETH, most of these things are just for toying around, and anything more serious can be achieved just fine by using trusted third parties. If you want to own an asset issued by somebody, it really isn't a big deal if the issuer controls said asset because you're not putting large amounts of money into it.

Now you might say "big money will use smart contracts", but for what? Would big players place their money into smart contracts that will "dumbly" execute the instructions given to them, regardless of any unexpected circumstances? Say, somebody hacks an API source and causes the smart contract to execute on a false premise. That threat will always be around with complex smart contracts, and I can see only more basic features such as timed escrows being used by big money, anything that requires complex scripting or external data will likely be instead achieved by using hand-picked and trusted external oracles, one or more, depending on the level of decentralization required. This leaves very little room for actual ETH-like turing complete smart contracts.

Thoughts?

>>5969091