/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>57269874
>Jan 12 2024 with $100k invested on Jan 12 2021:
LINK: $90,867.88
ETH: $244,007.67
BTC: $119,679.60
SOL: $2,498,618.78
BNB: $762,545.17
AVAX: $513,188.41
MATIC: $3,303,846.15
TRX: $368,858.13
DOGE: $800,112
ADA: $174,193.55
XRP: $190,332.12

>>57199075
More dead than Ari's book sales. They were always unfeasible, same as being the "sequencer for Arbitrum" and running ETH code on Chainlink nodes, more former cope from link cultists who thought they'd be running the game by now

>>57153632
Fucking kek, aww did I touch a nerve exposing the scam? No one cares about 2017, this is exactly why people buy crypto. From 2021-2024 people 10x'd and 100x'd their money, meanwhile you linktards literally lost money to inflation like the cucks you are. Imagine being outperformed by boomer value stocks

>>57046983
>stock basher

Ok boomer

>>57046931
>Cherry picks
>Completely ignores $100k to $109k in 3 years of a historic bull run

You aren't even trying to pretend you're retarded. I'm sorry you made a poor choice of investment

All Sergey did was remove every single mention of Bancor from their webpages and social media accounts. He never took responsibility for Bancor's 50% haircut on all LINK deposits

Just how fucking stupid is this board? 6 years and he's not once ever delivered any tangible evidence that he's anything but the same kind of retarded crypto scammer as Alex Mashinsky, or the Bancor team, or Do Kwon. What makes Sergey different? Promising made up "buidl" tokens? Promising products and releases and then remaining silent once the deadline passes? Hyping up people like Yorke Rhodes and Fernando Ribeiro, who eventually also disappear when it's clear they were being paid to promote?

>>56325570
>Spam the catalog 40 times a day
>Rent free

>>56325572
Didn't say they're lying, I said it won't make you rich. 100k stack is not even millionaire gains

>>55393342
Yes. The smarter you perceive yourself to be, the dumber your results. DOGE is 3 times the market cap of the project that swears it runs DeFi and secures all sorts of smart contracts. How secure is a networth worth 1/3 of DOGE? Is that something enterprises will actually trust?

>>54843194
>I will place my hand over my eyes
>I can't see anything wrong!

>>54187190
>He thinks this is effective deflection
>He thinks spamming "buy an ad" will distract people from Chainlink being a scam

Nice try but that's not gonna work. Maybe you can shill the blue dot thing again

Timeline going backwards
>Vodafone
>Coinbase layer 2/blue dot
>Chainlink Functions
>CCIP
>Enterprise abstraction layer
>Dynamic NFT's
>Staking rewards (oh my gawd look at my bank savings account APY LINK rewards)
>Chainlink build stake rewards
>SWIFT ISO20022
>SmartCon 2022

We can keep going back for years. They tried NFT's, dynamic NFT's, cross chain narratives, enterprise narratives, FSS and MEV, gaming, DECO and identity, all of this shit to keep you on the hamster wheel. Feel stupid yet?

>It w-wasn't us
>The new date is March marines! SWIFT and ISO HOLD THOSE BAGS MARINES

You niggers are relentless. The new date is always 2 more weeks. What happened to Arbitrum Nitro and Chainlink validation? What about OpenLaw, did that narrative die? Marines! how come so many of your catalysts die immediately?

>>53714685
It's an interesting similarity. Filed in the Cayman Islands instead of the US. Unlike FTX though... No equity exists in the company, so you can't attack the offshore structure. And unlike Sam, he rarely opens his mouth, tweets, appears on TV. Everything is by design. Like NXT, his whole motive is to rip off retail and make out like a bandit

>>53537320
>>53537352
>>53537365
>Damage control brigade finds thread, immediately tries to shit it up
>BTC went from $16k to $24k since staking released
>LINK has lost value since staking released

Cucks, have a (You)

>Have changed metrics 3 times since inception (TVL -> TVS -> TVE)
>Hyped up Arbitrum partnership and it disappeared off the face of the Earth
>Hyped up Oracle startups incubator partnership

>>53357320
That was your reaction to his blogpost

>>53357335
You're telling me millionaires and billionaires don't trust a Russian con artist that can't code? That holds conferences to give scam artists a platform to spread their scams within his scam?

>>53312739
N-no anon you don't understand!

>We encourage link holders to grab some yield on Bancor, totally safe and secure
>We even invited them to share their grift at SmartCon!

>>53250274
>>53250283
Whoops am I giving away the sauce? We aren't supposed to tell them that Sergey was in on every scam known to crypto right?

>>53119093
>Damage control please, STAT!
>Please deflect say anything attack the posters that expose us! We need to get the narrative back on track
>We are a trust worthy, honest company. We wouldn't dare lead our link marines into the bancor, ftx, celsius minefields. we also partnered with blockfi, gemini and nexo!

>>53054444
kek

>>53054435
See this is where the grift gets amplified. In the meantime let's work with pic related and get a bunch of people picked off

>We chose to implement Chainlink Keepers because it’s a decentralized network made up of the same time-tested, professional DevOps already running infrastructure for Chainlink Price Feeds, securing tens of billions of dollars in value throughout DeFi.