/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>19872377
I believe in dubs
Enlighten us bruv

>>14643397

Just go camping for a couple months.

>>14286267

>When people post "have sex", what do they really mean? I've been seeing this posted across every board in different variations or evolutions. Is it meant to be taken literally? Is it meant as an insult? Is it a response used to try to distract in a discussion from the actual discussion? I imagine most posters are male. For a poster to tell another poster to have sex, it implies said poster is not getting sex, or not getting enough sex- and that it should be their primary focus, either to ail them of their implied defect, or to gain the upper hand in an exchange of words. It seems like a coordinated attack on a board full of NEET virgins that is gaining traction and spreading. Is it possible there is something more actually going on? What is it about these two little words that have so much efficiency in trolling? It can be used to insinuate a lot, with so little effort. The best part is, it's completely open to interpretation. It allows a myriad of reasons of defectiveness and creates a situation of defensiveness for the person on the receiving end. If they attempt to defend themselves, it only comes across as giving credibility towards the person saying "have sex". Think about it. A lot of people on these boards are overcompensating...fit with muscles, fa with clothes, biz with money, etc. Saying "have sex" seems to be a way to cut through the bs, and make the person look like they're trying too hard. Even if you try to ignore it, it warps the perception of others, or at least makes them think about why you're not having sex. You could literally be having sex while posting, and someone could say "have sex" and no one would ever know that you were actually having sex the whole time. When is coinbase going to add chainlink?

>>14140882
Glad to see you know, anon.

>>14103229

Can someone make a frog post of this image?

>>13199718

>tfw the real adventure happened with the frens we made along the way

>>11390711

guys, i think we have to considered if big whales have gotten their bags silently..they dont have to shill at all because remember the value of link will rise naturally due to the nature of the network..the more usage on the network the more link HAS to be worth to support that network...so lets say it takes 5-10 years for full amazing adoption...the whales would be happy to accumulate this whole time just like us...they dont need to shill it all all for it to rise, it WILL happen.