/biz/ - Business & Finance

>markets

either they are calling bullshit on the debt default or maybe they know shit that normies don't realize and are running for the hills before June kek

That graph with the increasing volume looks like it's just about to blow the fuuuuck up. Or completely crash, who knows

>>22102197
I am a solidity dev
The dev has fucked up the timelock contract and can NEVER mint tokens, change ratios or anything, delay or no

This sounds bad but the project is safu, plenty of money to be made in the short term

Just don't bag hold forever like a retard

>>20088735
>>20088756
>>20088759
UBOMB has the best tokenomics long term
ACID is cool too though and a lot newer, bigger gains available while its still young

>>19223053
Seems legit

>>17619391
They are preparing for massive traffic on the network; orders of magnitude more than what we've seen
>>17619394
>made by mega corps
Boomers love corps, and boomers have most of the money
>It's the whole point to remain anonymous
Pseudo anonymity has worked fine for bitcoin; plus, you should be using xmr for such purposes
>it's been out since September shouldn't it be way bigger
It got slid, hard. This guy documented it here
https://youtu.be/XfGGMhzMfS8?t=186

>>15282283
>even ebay has better selection and deals
Yeah I would fucking hope so

>>13961887
mmm?

>>13422337
>MFW all in USD

>>13303872
Proceed

Where would I go to order this kind of service

>>12774037
Technically bitcoin isn't byzantine fault tolerant, as consensus must be definitive and blockchains are based on probability. The Hashgraph is not only BFT, but is asynchronous (aBFT) which has literally never been implemented in the history of the internet. ABFT voting algorithms with strong math proofs have existed for 30 years, but the bandwidth required to send and receive so many votes and receipts made them completely impractical. Hashgraph uses hashes and digital signatures to link events (transactions) together and create a history of communication, which allows us to apply those aBFT voting algorithms virtually, without sending any votes over the internet. Hashgraph not only sets the bar for security, but does so at incredible speeds. All that's needed to be communicated is the transactions themselves, the timestamp, plus two hashes (1-2% more data) and you gossip this out, which is the fastest known way to distribute information in a network. After that, latency to consensus is about 3 seconds, depending on node proximity, bandwidth, and number of nodes. Hashgraph is literally better than anything we've ever seen and are likely to ever see in our lifetime. People can hate on the patent and I understand that, but institutions and corporations don't necessarily subscribe to the same ideology; they want stability, governance and regulatory compliance. This is not /g/, we are /biz/nessmen and should only care about making money. Hedera has taken all the right steps to be fast-tracked to an ETF, leaving bitcoin in the dust

But nothing's happening,,,

>>5337091
So far 2 of 3 buys got filled. Feeling pretty comfy

>>5158374
this

>>4771560
The only color that should matter here is green. /pol/ should not be brought into /biz/. Investing based on political ideology rather than research and perspicacity is a good way to lose your money.

/thread

>>4517216
Link was never a moon mission. There is no reason for institutions to buy a bunch of link. There will be bonded nodes, but it's not PoS like OMG and ETH are doing. Link will only reflect the volume of data queries, if it even gets adopted, but you wouldn't want to pay for a service in a speculative crypto. An oracle would need to be set up to pay in dollar amounts for the data, so why not just create a dollar tied erc20 with Town Crier and charge fees on that? Link is entirely unnecessary. On top of that, institutions are using Hyperledger, not Ethereum, so even if they use it they wont be buying your shitcoin. Sell this fucking shitcoin and buy bitcoin you brainlets. How many BTC pumps are you going to miss because of this?

>>4099401
>MFT bought on ED for $.20 and sold for $.40
You fags need to stop marrying your coins. Get in, get gains, get out.

>>3966699
It's not like you can adjust the gas or anything

>MFW my account is fine

Not all in but I have 110k LINK, $20k in other coins. Should I just FOMO and go all in?

>>3625565
>Bitcoin enthusiasts, however, shouldn't get too excited about the big move up. Jafari warns that the gains are unlikely to last. She sees a drop of as much as 38.2% once the fifth wave is completed. That would mean a move back below $3,000. "At this point, Bitcoin would have to move back under 2,935 (Jul. 21st high/top of wave 1/V) to signal that a top is already in place," Jafari wrote.
The call was $3k. Under $2935 signals that $5k is the top and we go to $2200 . We did not break $2935 and are going to continue up

formatting fixed*

>>3058337
>-120btc
holy shit