/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>54464250
>The whole conspiracy to keep it quiet thing is where I get lost.
This notion arises from two sources:
1. the Nexo FUD campaign via their sock puppet VC Zeus Capital (unequivocably proves there was paid FUD against LINK)
2. the Hiding Strategy that Eric Schmidt (Chainlink advisor) used in the early days of Google. Google had cracked the code on monetizing the internet at scale and they kept this hush hush until they had sufficiently cornered the market. Given Chainlink's similar role in Web3 to Google's in Web2, and the Eric Schmidt advidory role, it stands to reason that they're playing from Schmidt's playbook here to some extent, even if it isn't intentional.

>>52504151
hmmm I wonder why

>>49411960
It's also interesting that there's only 30 days of data. We can't go back and see how profitable the network was back during the bull run -- post-LFG meltdown unambiguous bear market numbers only. Reminds me of the hiding strategy meme.
I'd encourage the subcontinent dwellers and turmeric monsters haunting this website to create a thread using publicly available data detailing the profitability of other crypto networks so that we can compare them to Chainlink objectively.