/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>56049530
>Explain in your own words why this is the best alt
I don't like most of the things the team does, am concerned about incompetence and then falling behind in terms of developers joining the ecosystem. Reasons being historical actions, current trajectories and wild speculation.
Yet I maintain the stance that there is no chain on the market that deals with the future of scaling the way kadena does (that being multi chain/layers with bridges) while maintaining the security needed for a decentralized settlement layer.
At some point I expect enough development to happen on the chain that the kadena team gets so overwhelmed with people trying to build on top and on chainweb to the point where they have to give in or change their approach on how they deal with the greater community.
Either that or no one continues to hear about it, historically that is what kept happening to them. Even funnier would be if their past communications or actions were to cause enough drama to overshadow the technology.
>why is there no metamask?
This is a standalone chain with its own contract language, the idea is, or used to be that people should not write contracts in solidity because of it's obscure nature once deployed and of the risk it poses from being Turing complete in an environment that makes it unnecessary (gas prohibits it by default).
But in some of the latest live amas from the founders, it was talked about how they could make some chains run on EVM, very rugpull-esque for them to say that.
Essentially what I am trying to say, is that I am feeling fear, uncertainty and, dare I sad doubt.