/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>20520348
basically you can't offer permissionless security without better clarification from legislation and cutting through some red tapes, at least in the current US legal framework
https://forum.makerdao.com/t/dmm-proposal-for-collateral-onboarding-of-dmm-mtokens/2141/3

>>20206571
Pic related
Also, it keeps on dumping

>>20197281
I posted pic related and tried to have genuine discussion in multiple occasions. But instead I was called a pajeet FUD and no body seemed to be interested in discussing the legitimacy of the project.
Well at least I have a 4X from public sale and got out, good luck anon.

>>20036476
ask them about the MakerDAO proposal, they raised a lot of quality questions about the project

https://forum.makerdao.com/t/dmm-proposal-for-collateral-onboarding-of-dmm-mtokens/2141

screenshot of the 2 main replies, I think there's some reasonable doubt and concerns about the project in it

>>19910464
wow 2 month and no response, looks like they got BTFO.
I always feel like legality will be the biggest issue here, what if someone who's on the sanction list from Venezuela, Russia, Iran, North Korea got into it? Will that defunct the DAO?

>>19910676
that means they'll forever retain control over the DAO. In fact 10% more voting power than everyone else who paid 20M+. LINK does not pretend to be a DAO