/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>8129254
Wrong.

>>4246416
1) just look at all the parties involved in Link: Swift, AXA, BNP Paribas, Sony, Santander, Barclays, ...
These entities wouldn't buy thumbtacks without NDAs.

2) It's been outright stated and heavily implied several times that they're not allowed to fully disclose whom they're working with (see pic)

>>4206812
>No partnership with AXA or Sony, this was confirmed by Rory that purely mockups.
Lmao no.
Rory confirmed that they did in fact have a smart contract with them.

Go look, the firewall contract signed by AXA and Sony is still live.

> their announcement last week was that they had just chosen GO as the language for Chainlink. this means they are absolutely fking no where when it comes to releasing the decentralized network.
Except Chainlink network V1.0 was finished before the presale. It's what they used for the Swift proof of concept and Sibos demo.
Source: https://www.coindesk.com/swift-completes-blockchain-smart-contracts-trial/

>however no smart contract will ever work with just one bank's data
This makes zero sense.

>>3932767
If you still aren't holding LINK at this point you aren't going to make it.