/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>16465025
We now have 4 sets of 54 numbers. Once again look closely at the individual sets. 2 of them are exactly the same. The first set and the fourth set are 100% identical.

The numbers are now almost perfectly replicating a hundreds or even thousands of years old diagram of the “The Shemhamphorasch”. How can this be a coincidence?

There is still one gaping discrepancy though, if you look at the previous table.
>>16465025
The first and fourth paragraphs are exactly the same but in “The Shemhamphorasch” the second and fourth “letters” are the same as in IHVH or YHWH.

You are told to take the first letter from the first paragraph of 72 letters in the Book of Exodus Chapter 14 verses 19,20 & 21, together with the last letter from the second paragraph of 72 and then once again the first letter from the third paragraph of 72 and continue in this fashion, it’s all a little convoluted.

Arranging the sets of numbers according to the “Shemhamphorasch” and created this next table by switching the positions of the top 3 sets of numbers.

Remember all we have done here is switch the order of the 3 top groups so that the 2 identical groups are in the right order, as per “The Shemhamphorasch”.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shem_HaMephorash

A 42-letter variant was described by Hai Gaon as אבגיתץ קרעשטן נגדיכש בטרצתג חקבטנע יגלפזק שקוצית. He wrote "Although the consonants of this name are well known, its proper vocalization is not rendered by tradition. Some pronounce its first part Abgitaẓ, and others Abigtaẓ, and the last part is sometimes read Shakvaẓit, and sometimes Shekuẓit, but there is no definite proof." This variation in pronunciation was understood by Joshua Trachtenberg to indicate that this version is quite ancient, the vowels in Hebrew being easily lost over time. It is, by some means, derived from the first 42 letters of the Hebrew Bible.[5] Like the 22-letter name, it is found in the Sefer Raziel HaMalakh.[7]