/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>19734315
Ok retard, then explain why were they worried about SEC >>19733566 You can't explain it.

>>19734337
If you look into her resume, she's just an HR rep bullshit artist that glomped onto the blockchain buzzword to carve out a corner for herself in the field. Zero technical knowledge. The question then is, why would V-ID pay her to be an advisor?

>>16826255
>We made at least five threads, day in and day out, for nearly 8 months as it bled from 55 cents to 8 cents and lower
>We're promoting this investment opportunity out of the kindness of our hearts
>We told you VIDT will be on Binance in Q3, V-ID is a first-mover, that V-ID owns the majority of the market share with 32 clients, and make up outright lies about Acronis
>But p-p-pp-please sirs, believe us about this fudder...

Note to anons: See how they don't respond to arguments when they get BTFO and instead focus on the person? They make a claim like "V-ID is generating millions in revenue" or "V-ID has the market share" then when someone proves them wrong they disappear and another anon with "1 post by this ID" takes their place who will make another erroneous claim until the head TG honcho makes another thread like nothing happened.

It's funny that the only way bagholders can promote their project now is by discrediting the personality of fudder. Evidently, there is nothing else going for it, other than ponzi buyback burns, at which point you might as well buy NUKE or any of the hundreds of deflationary cryptocurrencies that are out there.

^ pasta btw

>>16763413

>>16628170

>>16163899

>>15875496

>>15813484
Still holding those tokens since February, eh?

>>15757559
weak hands being shaken out