/biz/ - Business & Finance

would you give up all your possessions just to be 16-18 years old again? you wake up as a hobo but young

>>15894660
BCH stopped being true to the idea of bitcoin as soon as they implemented checkpoints. those were fine early on but at this point, no. it should only be the longest chain that matters, not if your checkpoint is correct or not.

regardless of what you think of craig, BSV really is bitcoin now. i've nothing against BCH in particular but i'm happy bitcoin lives on, at leats for a little while.

>>15894666
i doubt that will happen again. every project get one hyped mass hysteria that doesn't pan out, the second one is not as easy. unless there's like 25 years between the two i guess.

at least we have the halving to look forward to, maybe something will happen then. but OH it's just all about speculation AGAIN, whoopdiedoo. the dream is still dead, it's still just all about making fiat

>>10258372
i still dont think most people know that people born before 1998 are millenials. 1998+ are generation z

>tfw im apparently a millenial

>>9484829
tell me friend, if an open-source project have all their devs --that are allowed to actually commit code to the repository-- all employed by the same company, and they deny code merges that would compromise the company's goal, what other choice do people have than to fork off in their own direction? remember that none of these developers with commit rights were actually around when satoshi were involved.

truth is that right now there are two competing ideas on how bitcoin should proceed into the future. both have enough people behind them to warrant both a shot at the title "bitcoin".