/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>20065195
lol, stick to your meme lines and "if we have another bull run X" then you fucking jabroni.

>>20065220
Yeah, that shit takes way longer to type out and it's not like I save the numbers. I have to google for 5 minutes every time...something these faggot redditniggers apparently dont know how to do (that and reverse image search). 700b industry in the us, 1.2t world (trucking only, never bothered to find good numbers on merchant marine, dont know the proper technical terms to find real data). Anyone thats dealt with either side of shipping or receiving goods/warehousing should know how much paperwork and fat office women can be replaced with some basic automation.

>>20031956
Hellllooo reddit. Great brainlet tier take, right up there with the XRP retard.

You do realize there are already insurances in place against these failures that would be brought over right? That a failsafe system of a few dozen nodes would never fully fail. and therefore the penalty for a failure to report/tampered data will never have to actually cover a full transaction (it will only be a slap on the wrist, 5% of their 1/50 covering maybe 25-50% (jew insurance covers the rest)?

Ignoring all that and pretending your dumbass take is real, if CL takes over the entire swiftGPI platform (85% of their total traffic) and bumps the efficiency to the levels it promises (almost all transactions completed in <5 mins) ... the total value needed for CL collateral is just over 1b averaged out, maybe 2-3b to account for larger volume in euro business hours. This is all at the max allowable 5 minutes, most should complete in a tic or two, decreasing those numbers signifigantly.

Not FUD, just realistic outlooks from someone that actually does his research. My entire networth minus 25 year old pickup is in LINK...SWIFT is more for the name and street cred, there are way more lucrative avenues. Ps: its all about per link per year revenue, not gayass collateralization "value".