[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance

Search:


View post   

>> No.30411490 [View]
File: 16 KB, 428x312, jvdhadd.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
30411490

>>30411001
This is the post you want me to respond to. It absolutely does change the fact that it's trying to buy 1287 RBC with 0.45 ETH. If the platform fee is taken out of the transaction that means it has to buy that amount of rubic with less eth, 0.3 to be precise, and slightly less again because it also pays the gas fees out of the transaction. As I literally just posted in the OP.

"That is the confirmation transaction showing the order being placed, you can see the order is for 0.45 ETH to 1287.365 RBC.
Removing the transaction fee this means the market rate needs to be around
0.30 ETH to 1287.365 RBC. Gas fees are also taken out of this transaction and we have no way of knowing what they would be exactly in this case. Between 0.01 and 0.02 seems reasonable? Let me know if you disagree with this. We'll say 0.015 ETH gas fees so the trade has to be 0.285 ETH to 1287.365 RBC.
The market rate to fill this order would therefore have to be 1 ETH = 4515 RBC.
The order was placed on March 6th at 7:41 AM UTC. The market price at that time was 1 ETH = 4303 RBC. 8 hours later the market price hit 1 ETH = 4624 RBC. Between these times it got extremely close to and passed over the trade rate needed to fill this order, yet the order was not filled."

Please respond explaining what part of that pasted statement is incorrect. Stop ignoring this question and just throwing back more numbers to confuse anons, I deliberately made the ratios simple and went through step by step, what part of what I said is incorrect.

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]