/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>57872795
>muh ATH

>>57348488
You could have done so at basically any point in the last year and would have gotten beautiful gains. Hell, it is up +20% just these last two weeks.
Nah, responsible investing only. But bloody hell I hate DCAing into US tech. It's quite expensive. But since it cannot go down, it is the responsible choice to make.

>>57310617
WTF. Random +8%. Where are these big movements even coming from? Suddenly a massive injection of money... sounds about right.
Earnings leaked. +10000% revenue, no longer bleeding cash, net earnings +15 billion dollars. Something like that

>>56962181
Yeah, AMD is gonna surpass its ATH of 2021 just like NVDA and then go another +20%. Should to to about 160 by EoY. Good choice son.
>>56961395
Gold is still a good deal. Just buy actually good stocks that have good revenue, positive and low P/E, low overhead costs, high margins. Something like Lundin Gold

>Broadcom +9%
What the hell is it doing? Nice graph btw. Only up and up. Oh well, another loss. At least my mum bought it at 300 when I recced it to her.

>>56903209
>FAGMAN stock casually pumping almost 6%
This is actually quite incredible. Once again boomers were right. There really is no better advice or model to follow than "keep buying and never look back". Just DCA and enjoy massive gains. This is not 2008. This is not the dotcom bubble. The companies really are making that much money. Despite the so called restrictive policy, these companies have managed to pull in record amount of cash. Imagine how much they will make as we get the printer back

>>56786644
A lot of Swedish companies are not Swedish. They kind of have to remain in Sweden to keep receiving their truly astonishing government benefits and gibs. Sweden is held by the balls by these big companies. They have the ultimate leverage.
That is why they are taxed less. If the big companies had to pay the same taxes as normal people, they could never build up their business. That's why for example IKEA was not founded in Sweden (yet is hailed as the quintessential Swedish company bc normos can't help themselves).
That's why you shut up, keep working, and keep buying. We shrimps have it easy like that. Stocks go brrrrr
>>56786649
Indeed they are.

>>56718986
NVDA? To 600, then a split 1:4, and then to 250. Ez? This is beyond bussin sussin lit fire senpai

>>56683377
Because you're better off investing in no-cap companies.

>>56670370
I honestly do not understand how anyone can invest into crap like this. Utter garbage company that keeps bleeding cash like mad. As it gigapumped earlier this year, it really proved there is no organic trade in the market. The algos saw the name "ai" and just poomped it.
I'll stick to my NVDA

Also, oil and gasoline keep falling. Electricity prices are on the rise again. Next month's inflation numbers are gonna be interesting. Even if they are higher than expected, the FED won't care and and can say it's an off-number (i.e., not statistically significant). So yeah, we be pumping until end of December at least.

>>56659512
Maybe I'm retarded but how do you erase a debt? Doesn't that mean that the banking system essentially just lost money? There's no way they would allow that so they gotta find ways to cover up or make up for that loss.
>>56659483
Not at ATH, great earnings, great guidance, tech is in a boom, infrastructure is also booming, rates have peaked, steady inflation to ensure a nice growth, consumer is gigastrong, Santa rally, gasoline is getting cheaper, China finally stimulating the housing market, and so on and on... it's never too late to get in on the action, m8. I just bought even more NVDA in fact

>>56541338
$8x,xxx goes pretty far in Regina/Saskatchewan. I was also raised here, so I have "roots".
Was better when there weren't so many niggers and singhjeets, though...

Is there even a bobo thesis anymore? This pretty much guarantees the Santa rally. We have broken the downtrend and will now keep pumping. I honestly cannot imagine being a bobo right now as we have literally peaked when it comes to rates.
They are fuckin bureaucrats what do you not understand? If they can use the y/y effect to slowly very slowly erode the inflation, they fuckin will. Yes, we will have a high inflation for 2+ years, who cares? Strong economy can take and normies have substantial economical buffers to deal with this. The lower classes might be in a bit of a pickle but they matter not in the eyes of the market

>>56492433
>Broad diversification
That's the problem. You should identify a few good trends and stick to them. My mum for example bought a metric shitton of tech in the years after the 2009 crash and is now enjoying such insane gains that it would put 99.99% of /smg/ to shame.
Also bought good companies that keep generating good money, increasing profits, and increasing divvies. Pepsi, Caterpillar, Lockheed, Exxon, and so on.
Broad diversification is a meme because everyone knows that certain areas will inevitably do better than others. Everyone knows that the magnificent seven carries the markets and have a dominant role in the world. So you could very well just stick to them and enjoy beautiful gains instead of diversifying into many other sectors.
I could write a whole blog about this but just think about it. If there is one thing I've learned it's to stick to a few really good companies that I am truly familiar with.
Also
>have 5k gains
Meaning you are doing better than the market if you've been holding for 2 years. At least you're in the plus, m8

>>56477111

>>56449333
This week is gonna be so green, bros. Strong season. The magnificent seven will ultra carry this market.
I expect Amazon and Meta to utterly demolish the earnings. Ford will also do amazingly. Alphabet/MSFT/Texas Instruments should do well.
Exxon is gonna be interesting. If their earnings keep increasing despite the lower oil prices... hmm, we shall see.
But yields have pulled back and so has the dollar. The situation down in the middle east is no longer escalating. Yeah, I'm thinking we're back

>>56403657
I work either in a lab coat or naked. Hate suits.
Heh, bonds are retreating. Probably FED buying them again. We finna pump fr fr bussin lit fire bros

>>56391292
Why AMD and not NVDA? NVDA ain't bleeding cash and is grabbing more and more market share. And significantly ahead in AI. But I digress. AMD's earnings were dog shit and I can't really see their earnings improving anytime soon. But then again the market doesn't care about but only cares if they can beat "expectations". Throw in some catchy AI and you have another bull run.
The graph of AMD still looks kinda bullish in my opinion and even though I think the company is insanely overvalued (hell, an offal kiosk makes more money), we are soon entering the two most bullish months and a Santa rally.
Given that you haven't sold yet, I would keep holding. As long as FED is maintaining the markets and injecting liquidity, I would keep holding stocks since that's the best way to hedge against inflation.
If yields go to 5.5-6%, then I might consider them.
Now, gimme b00bs

>>56377576
>Surely this is bullish for the economy, right?
It's bullish for stocks and that's all that matters. You guys seem to make the mistake of thinking economy = stock market. A lot of the personnel is useless or contributes very little so it's fine to lay them off and increase profits that way.
You don't see companies like Caterpillar do that though, mostly tech. I wonder why ;-----)...

>>56362660
Not really. My personal spending has barely increased these past 10 years. And 10% return per year beats zero or negative returns.
>>56362676
Hmm, if Euro starts to weaken because of ECB, I would get more when I eventually exchange back to Euro. But that is of course risky.
But Romanian currency ain't pegged against Euro and it just keeps dropping vs Euro. How is that a better investment? You are losing value if you are holding the bonds in Lei... unless you can somehow buy them in Euros

>>56323590
Why? Just buy bonds and you have guaranteed gains. KO and Pepsi can easily do another -5-10%. We'll see next week as they announce earnings. For now, both stocks look really damn un-slurpable.
>>56323594
This is why index chads always win. Since the index includes the big mega caps, they can never lose money. Mega caps can never stay down for long. Hell, I remember last year when autismos were yelling at the top of their lungs that Apple was gonna drop down to 100... fuckin pathetic

A lot of normo sites reporting that S&P is on the way down to 4200. You know what that means right? We're gonna pump so hard. This is gonna be so lit fr fr bros

>>56175054
Only at bussin' prices.

>>55969693
Multiple reasons, m8. Supply and demand is an important factor to consider. People are selling less, but the number of people keeps rising and people need somewhere to live. Therefore, you can set the price and they have to follow.
And you know... the other stuff.
Getting a house will never not be a bad investment