[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]

/biz/ - Business & Finance

Search:


View post   

>> No.53799436 [View]
File: 47 KB, 1400x487, ethereum-l2-proof-type-and-data-availability.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
53799436

>>53798068
It's the plasma that Reddit chose for its community points: https://nova.arbitrum.io/

>> No.53799387 [DELETED]  [View]
File: 47 KB, 1400x487, ethereum-l2-proof-type-and-data-availability.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
53799387

>>53798068
It's the plasma that Reddit chose for its community points.

>> No.53784153 [View]
File: 47 KB, 1400x487, ethereum-l2-proof-type-and-data-availability.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
53784153

>>53783010
>>53783179
Both are built on Arbitrum Nitro:
- Arbitrum One is an optimistic rollup, meaning it favors security.
- Arbitrum Nova makes use of an off-chain data-availability committee, making it a plasma, which favors throughput: https://twitter.com/arbitrum/status/1557025244858224640

Inb4 "are you saying that Arbitrum Nova is less secure?" No, the "favors security" part has to do with how easy it is to leave the network if something happens to it.
The on-chain data-available of rollups means the data is already on Ethereum (in the case of optimistic rollups being delayed by at most 14 days due to the nature of fraud proofs).
Whereas with plasma and validia that data is stored by a data-availability committee whom you're relying on. The more members the better though.

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]