/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>52669484

>>8992307
This shit is classic pre-war ethereum gold.

So let's do this.
Post'em anons.

>>8789157
sergeant major reporting in
is 10k+ enough to make it?

>>7774630
This is the original one made by The Great Lt Colonel Aleron Helix (Major at that time) that got me through the darkest times, it's been updated since then, but I believe it remains more less the same

Ok, now, since OP faggot has been BTFO already, I'm taking over this thread, post your ranks, share stories, let OP be a cuck

>>4524345
it was smart doing it a few weeks ago, now it's pretty much playing with fire, as I expect LINK to start picking up steam very soon, don't see it going lower than 14c

also posting the original dug out from the archives a long time ago

>>4506552
I'm like 45% btc, 35% LINK right now,
you don't have to preach to me about btc, I started as a maximalist die hard hodler thinking it'll go to 500k or something, but things change, a big ass correction will probably eventually happen, also what if wall street fags decide to short the fuck out of btc when it hits CME? normies are already picking up on the tether/bitfinex drama.
Also with btc being as expensive as it is right now, normies pretty much cannot afford a full 1 btc anymore, so they will just happily buy 0.2 or something, and guess what happen once every normie has his sweet ass comfy chunk of btc, whether it's 5 of them or 0.05?
Everyone starts to wait, hoping it'll moon, but how, when there is no new money coming in because every fucker has already bought?
The greater fool theory will end sooner or later. It'll correct like a mother fucker once the panic ensues.

>>4506565
I'm sure there won't be any news this year. Actually all the news will probably pretty much come at once, when they launch the main net.
So why not wait untill then you may ask?
well this market is stupid but not THAT stupid, many people already have LINK at the back of their heads willing to jump back in the beginning of 2018. I expect a trend reversal in late december

RANKS

>>4432821
yea I see what you mean, but that strategy is good for shitcoins, or even some good coins too, but it's because 99.9% of the coins out there have no real life outside-crypto use case. Their only purpose is to function around other shitcoins creating new ones/moving them etc.
So it's driven only by speculation, of course it's a rollercoaster that way, and selling in increments is smart but with Chainlink when their product is finished and all those institutions start using it? they only way it's gonna go is UP and then pobably stagnate on some level like ETH or Ripple today

>>4272023
agree
99% of all coins' prices even most of those in TOP10 are based purely on speculation, we don't really know how much they're worth untill the real use case demand kicks in

so imagine LINK with all those future juicy announcement AND a huge use case deman on top of that,
doesn't matter that it's an ERC20 token, token is just a payment method, there is absolutely no reason why Chainlink project wouldn't be worth more than ETH
that's why money skelly is secretely so butthurt about Sergey, he knows damn well that Sergey has the missing link to smart contracts. Vitalik has the fish and Sergey has a top calss fishing wand

Sergeant reporting in

>>4240161
who then decides about the amount of nodes needed for a specific task?
how about the difficulty of running one (which the token's value will be dependent on)?

>>4236474
In memory of The Great MAJ Aleron-HELIX
please report in accordingly