/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>25685461
I don't think you understand how sudden and complete the paradigm shift will be when Starship flies it's first commercial customer. 100 tons, to any orbit, for a couple million dollars. SpaceX can take a 90% margin and still be cheaper than any other rocket, and carry ten times the payload of almost any commercial rocket. Since we can't invest in SpaceX, the next best thing is investing in the payload operators and manufacturers who suddenly have 10x more weight to play with for 10x less cost.

>>25627078
No, it isn't. It's a glorified vomet comet that barely grazes the edge of space for five minutes before falling back to Earth. And it's already obsolete.

>>25526292
There is literally a production line churning out two Starships per month. This will lower cost to orbit by two orders of magnitude. All you can see is /pol/ memes about Jews and Chinks. I don't give a fuck. I'll invest in reality, you invest in your schizo delusions and communist shitholes.