/biz/ - Business & Finance

ITT: people discussing the "dumping" of bitcoins that don't exist. CSW made up the whole thing and is up to no good.

>>14432101
There's a caveat.

Read this if you want to understand this court case. Otherwise it won't make sense.

>>14099568
The law won't create coins out of thin air if he doesn't own them. Sorry. Thanks to that greedy imbecile Ira Kleiman for filing a lawsuit and letting us see the documents. Probably much more people would still believe in the Tulip bullshit otherwise.

>>14059287
There are no bitcoins, you dishonest low IQ monkey. There are just Craig's larp emails. You all make it look like everyone's laying into poor Craig and trying to swindle him of his wealth when in reality he has none.

>>13956065
Bullshit.

>>13956184
Yes, documents with larping. But even in theory, you can't "lock" your private keys. Even if you give them away etc., you can still have access to the funds if you saved a copy.

altcoins

sell your shitcoins while you can

sell your shitcoins while you can

sell your shitcoins while you can

>>13421826

its over for altcucks

>forktards gonna fork

old news. And in other also old news: BTC continues path towards world domination. $1million by 2030.

>>13271212
CSW is dead in 2029, he went full cobain.

>I won't attempt to prove CSW is Satoshi here, but I will say this: I learned more about Bitcoin from listening to all his talks than anything else in the past five years. Do not underestimate Craig.
>I won't attempt to prove CSW is Satoshi here, but I will say this: I learned more about Bitcoin from listening to all his talks than anything else in the past five years. Do not underestimate Craig.
>I won't attempt to prove CSW is Satoshi here, but I will say this: I learned more about Bitcoin from listening to all his talks than anything else in the past five years. Do not underestimate Craig.

HAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAAHHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHA
lets break this down
>I won't attempt to prove CSW is Satoshi here
you can't prove, he can't prove, his attempts to prove were all pathetic attempts at social signaling, one of the most cringe shit I've ever seen, even more cringe than his LinkedIN page full of gibberish and his PhDs about gibberish that make no sense.
The reason he got caught up is because he DIDN'T KNOW that it was possible to sign/verify messages using bitcoin. He knows now, but he learned that after he started claiming this shit. He is a bad conman, classic mistake.

Nick Szabo is satoshi nakamoto 100%. He created blockchain and bitcoin using old e-cash/e-gold ideas and mashing it together. He was developing it since 1998. He even attempted to mask bitcoin's old name 'bit gold' by making it seem like bitcoin is older.

>I learned more about Bitcoin from listening to all his talks than anything else in the past five years.
LOL
you learned about bitcoin from the retard that says you can get negative gamma on the network?
from the morons who think the size of a block determines the time until the next one is found?
from the faggot who wants only data centers to run full-nodes?
get the fuck out of here you stupid bitch, you know nothing about bitcoin.

>>12855983
>he isnt satoshi
How about this

>>12748787
They are desperate forkcoin bagholders.

>>12741922
cope

>>12721087
Said the redditor.

>>12710564
>believe notorious conman is satoshi without proof
>"you retards"

>let's raise the blocksize so niggers can afford onchain transaction at the cost of network centralization but you are the socialists
imagine the IQ