/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>55060924
>yeah bro, that's what I'm saying, it wasn't supposed to work out like that
Yes it was. See pic.

It doesn't even make sense to make money as a node purely from staking.
The stake is collateral, which by definition should be a zero-sum game if all goes well.
The value that staking provides is that it requires the token to have a high enough MC to be able to collateralize the value that passes through the Chainlink network.

>>55060971
>It's not just an extra security measure, it's a requirement.
If you know the real-world identity of the node that fucked up, you can sue them.
Staking would still be better in many ways, but it's simply not a strict requirement.