[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance

Search:


View post   

>> No.13316531 [View]
File: 1.67 MB, 1446x1920, 1500163389730.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13316531

To be fair, on technological grounds, why would anyone choose BTC over BCH? BTC has nothing in its roadmap for a long time while BCH will have Schnorr signatures support in only 1 month from now. I'm seriously considering to convert my modest BTC holdings for BCH.

>> No.2855118 [View]
File: 1.67 MB, 1446x1920, 1500163389730.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2855118

>>2851913
Thanks a lot, /biz/raeli! But what does this mean?
> don't want SegWit contaminating the blockchain though (it reorganizes transactions, splitting them up and doing funky shit with them),

> So a few months ago Core started blackmailing the miners by advocating for a UASF, which would soft fork the network and implement SegWit by force.
Is the UASF a mass rebellion in which users switch to another client which doesn't accept the miners' version?

>so they are forking before it is implemented on August 1
If they fork it after, what will happen? Will the old chain disappear all of a sudden?

>This is the UAHF/BitcoinABC/Bitcoin Cash hard fork.
What's wrong with a hardfork if it won't affect the Core mainstream blockchain, and what stops a group of people from doing a fork whenever they doesn't like his "new balance"?

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]