/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>16633032
You’re finally making sense, this is your best post.

>>16633224
Not true not true! I explained why the AMRN shill was wrong about insider buys and posted a pic. He was straight up just lying and claiming insiders were buying when they’ve been doing nothing but selling for years!

In fact, what are you talking about? I make plenty of explanations. I think you’re confused by that one copypasta post.

I don’t pick posts to disagree with to look smart, I object to the posts I find the most objectionable.

>>16633334
Very true that is a cope. Though most of the time that’s exactly when I should be buying more, when I get a pullback from the recent highs that have formed a “resistance”

>>16633188
I don’t actually know what you’re talking about srrz

>>16633356
I don’t want anons gambling on these extremely speculative stocks. I know galt has ZERO products on the market and has never made a profit. Maybe one day, maybe next year, they’ll deliver 1000% returns. But they could also go bust. I use a few $’s here and there for those gambles, like I had a limit that never triggered for buying 1 share of Dean’s Foods.

I would rather put my money in companies that are making money.