/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>27404599
>That's like trying to predict the whole point of the internet before it was available for public consumption. The whole point of chainlink won't be apparent for 20 years, and by then it will have redefined how we even think about value.
indeed....dont be pic related

>>26347597
>wants what took me years to finally figure out (through rigorous study) handed to him on a silver platter
Kek. You remind me of why I love ICT's reversed engendered method of beating around the bush......it weeds out those who are willing to work for it and those who lazily want the answers spoon fed to them.
I mean christ, desu. He isn't trying to sell you anything. The only investment you have to make is an investment of time in the form of study.
>THE INTERNET IS AT YOUR DISPOSAL
If you cant do that, you're ngmi.

Simple as

>>23529650

>>16789439
>>16789239
Krugman is a very wise economist with a great understanding of the grand scheme of things. Kinda like all the link fudders who are so concerned for marine's interests.
>jannies get the rope too

>>16788701
>doesnt know how IPs work
gee, imagine my surprise, desu

>pic related

>>16689360
you remind me of Paul Krugman.
Must be the room temp IQ.
Yeah, thats it.

Is Paul Krugman the ultimate patron saint of discord trannies?
Anybody who fuds the God Protocol would have never understood the potential of the internet at its inception.

>>16675573
But it only went to $1500 or whatever price was in scale with the ICO explosion.
MEANWHILE
>once LINK surpasses $1500, it will be in scale with just a fragment of the derivatives market.
>once LINK surpasses $20K, it will be in scale with not even a third of the derivatives market and hardly 3% of all other existent and potential markets to be had in the emergent DeFi web of globally scalable commerce on a blockchain
We're still sooooooo early.

>>14525071
Statues, acts and codes administered by filthy deceiving (((lawyers))) = gambling against humans too only, the Courts are the Casino and the public is forced to bet against the House.

I'll take Trustless P2P contract execution over a goddamn lawyer any day. And so will SWIFT, Amazon, Google, IBM, and every other entity that wishes to exist 10 years from now
>You are about to see an entire industry (the trust assurances industry) be swallowed whole by a decentralized network. The marginal value of all trust assurances services in the world (contracts lawyers, non-criminal courts, administrative workers etc.) will become the chainlink network. Those groups which don't make this transition will cease to exist. In 20 years it will be hard to imagine how the world functioned without such a network, just as it's hard to imagine a world without the internet now.


You're about to watch the whole world realize, slowly, this new reality. Remember that it takes hours and hours of dedication to get what I'm saying right now. Next year you'll just have to be a CEO/CTO level person to understand. The year after that, someone who is considered smart and cutting edge. You're about to witness all of this happen.
>>14514096

>>14522873
Hows it feel knowing a bunch of sexist racist nazis are about to become multimillionaires many times over?

>>14521902
>Now USD is deflationary so the nodes won’t have to worry about inflation, but they will have worry about exchange rate volatility.
To what degree can that exchange rate volatility (as well as over extended explorative price expansion) be mitigated by the Chainlink's own Market Making stacks?

If anything, it appears the decision to take on the risks of ERC staking, may've been a hedge on the notion that the current paradigm of global commerce was overdue for a transformative correction and/or upgrade, and rather than a Central Bank reset button, we got a God protocol that incentivizes doing business more honestly than your competitor.

>>14508919
Hell yeah, OP. Blacks (like all people) lurk 4chan first out of curiosity, then because of the unfiltered decimation and elicitation of opinion, opinions often informed by (((historic))) and (((market)) understanding that the Media and schools intentionally hide from us all.

Some of the identitarians of /biz/ are ironic, some aren't. I give mo fucks either way. The offensive content keeps the low IQ parasites away.

>>14509077
They could if they wanted to. But they don't. Thats the fucking point.

>>14509029
What if i told you its impossible for BTC to function above a certain network volume and price?

Once all the whales have moves enough BTC into LINK and USD, LINK will be fully decoupled from the crypto market, functioning as a unique asset all it's own that has NO competitor.

Imagine holding shares in the internet at it's inception.
>pic related

>>6525270
Boomer keynesians are fucking retards.

so what the difference between his statements and the naysayers of cars, radio, television, the internet etc?

people, especially old people, always say these things about technological advancement, and they're always wrong.

Why does this board hate holders?

>>5433852

>>1807011
>It's amazing how much and how often economists are in disagreement.

that's because economics is insanely politicized, perhaps more than any other field of science (aside from obvious meme fields like gender studies or sociology)

you get hard right-wing / libertarian guys loke sowell or friedman, whose response to literally every question boils down to "government is the problem, remove government to fix problem"
and you get dudes like pic related who are the complete opposite and cream their pants over the idea of large scale government intervention in the market