/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>49378236
>I just shot her in the chest over and over for four hours.
In minecraft, right?

>>24264963
>This PLTR pump is unsustainable btw.
People keep saying stuff like this. Is this just based on feelings or is it meant to happen because of some unholy stock market law?

>>21339834

>>17527947
>>17527957
>>17527958
>>17527964
>>17527986
>>17527988
>>17528085
>>17528101
>>17528116
>>17528179
>>17528208
>>17528222
>>17528256
>>17528269
>>17528287
>>17528352
>>17528377
>>17528413
>>17528419
>>17528453
>>17528469
>>17528515
>>17528527
>>17528534
>>17528548
>>17528636
>>17528901
>No one gives a single fuck about OXT
>suddenly heaps of thread full of shills out of nowhere
fuck off back to your discord, no one here gives a fuck about your shitty pump and dump scam.

>>17123680

>>10502625
It's not even the right question I think. It's like convince me Oraclize will beat SQL first. Convince me LINK is a secure network. Convince me trust has been minimized. Convince me LINK is more than a smokescreen to buy time to do something they don't know how to do.

>>9342840
No. Now that you mention it I don't even know why I didn't close the tab sooner.

are alts going to go up or down when BTC goes on its next run?

I have no fucking clue at myself at this point. Obviously typically in the past alts crash when BTC runs in both USD and sats, but when BTC went from 16k -> 8k -> 13k in late decemeber, many alts recovered back close to ATH with many doing full moon missions to new ATH

so my question is

is it different this time? Are altcoin projects valuable enough that money will try to get back into them as soon as the market go bull again? Or will BTC have to lead the way for a while for anything to happen with alts?

>>5500298
nice pasta, faggot