/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>54689681
Blatantly false, my friend. You didn't even take a look at the forecast, Mr. Pajeet. You lost all credibility and you're just spreading disinformation in bad faith. You've convinced me that ALL bed based and beyond dissenters are retarded indian shills. You don't even know how to look at numbers, you didn't even take a glance at it, because you are from a third world country and you're using google translate to talk to me. LOOK AGAIN. Where did you get 50% from this model? If you look at base case, the forecasted revenue for Y1 (in millions) is 9,825. In Y2 (in millions) the forecasted revenue is 9,990. How did you calculate 50%? You just made that shit up. The % change between Y1 (the following fiscal year) and Y2 is 1.65%. Where did you get 50%?

https://www.alphaspread.com/security/nasdaq/bbby/dcf-valuation/base-case

Ohh, did you mean net margin? Still nowhere near 50%. Did you mean net income? Still nowhere near 50%. If you can't tell the difference between gross revenue, gross margin, and net income, then you have no credibility to talk to me.

Even *if* they had aggressive forecasts for the next fiscal year, that would make total sense because they're going through a fundamental restructuring of the company. The margins will factually improve because they're downsizing, yeeting unprofitable brands, yeeting unprofitable stores. Not only that, they're switching to learn towards an ecommerce focus. BBBY *is* going to rocket into uranus no matter what you do.

Too bad your employer doesn't know I'm a retarded autist, refuse to listen to anyone, and will dump 50% of my paychecks into BBBY indefinitely. Your jewish shilling won't perturb me.

Too bad bears don't realize that the bear thesis is actually a BULL thesis. In the absolute worst case scenario, if they go bankrupt, both RC's and Icahn's cocks will get hard AF and they'll come for BBBY in a hostile takeover.

>B-but that makes no sense, m-muh profit.
Nothing about BBBY makes any sense.