/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>18981706
Well shit. More liquidity, less debt, constructed more VLCC's, far and ahead of any regulations that can be put further on the market, quarterly dividend outlook, that sheer explosive growth, stability during these years of downturn, paying 2 divvies this time around. I admit I looked at more of the pure data than reading the report before, but this is great. They were but a fledgling that couldn't take advantage of 2016, and they weren't around for the last super massive contango. Perhaps bigger firms haven't picked up on them because they are the new kid and just coming into their own, perhaps they are going to buy the crap out of it now if they produce again Q2. They have grown into a giant like some of the others, but since they were new and appeared during the years of downturn nobody looks at them or picks them up, very low market cap, unfairly low. This might be a case of "new challenger before they are officially recognized" and will explode and maintain higher once time goes by. Very interesting, I want to own them for this time period now, and they are so damn stable that even if tanker plays are a miss I won't lose much at all on them. But...is it potentially an even longer term buy than the rest I wonder? They seem stable and ahead of the competition, call me crazy but I am seriously wondering and want more data as time goes on to see if they can remain in a good position after all of this.

>>18981882
You accidentally put one of my posts in there, it makes me sad. I am not a Brandon. We just got the same color.

>>18499915
IT'S OVER. RUN FOR THE HILLS, SHIT IS ABOUT TO MOTHER FUCKING COLLAPSE!

>>18500003
>lunchtime dip
When did this meme start. For weeks now it has been a lunchtime pump. The fact it went lower means....oh boy.