/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>8420820
yes. kinda. it's worth something because it's *designed* to be worth something. being a seamless, self-contained system, it exists to pay miners who mine it. they then hold it or sell it for more than the constantly rising price of what it cost them to mine—or, if they're brain damaged, they sell it at a loss, quit mining, and wagecuck.
you're not like one of those brain damaged miners—are you, anon? even if it takes you years, you'll understand, some day, that what i am explaining is correct. we are literally still at the ground floor of proof-of-work cryptocurrencies. they are unstoppable. if you want a totally secure investment that, in ten years, will be worth thousands of times what they are worth today, you buy bitcoin cash. you buy monero. you buy peer-to-peer, decentralized, proof-of-work cryptos that have strong miner support—because they are virtually unstoppable. thanks to forks, though, they are *entirely* unstoppable.

also, chainlink is a very good investment. sergey deserves a place in all this.

The higher the price gets, the bigger Sergey grows. How high can it really get before he pops?

>>6719364
yeah but the memes produced were legendary. Can you imagine what we're going to see at this conference? Big LINK holder here but I can't wait for the FUD memes.