/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>5463658
I wouldn't hold that much OMG for adaption reason.
On technical scale project is solid however I don't see them establishing a presence in the west or taking a firm holding in Japan or China.
I believe they may dominate SEA but that's all.
In short, it's overvalued, because OMG is underused as payment platform

>>4249995
I have 1 million and 20k of it. I wanted to pump in 5 more btc so I would have 200k more. Let's hope binance whales dump some cheap chain links for me, for the good times

>>4210231
Great dividends, plus I have valuable info about it. I only can say that there was a reason why it skyrockets to 12k satoshis, however, the team didn't deliver it and postponed it until further report and not it is at the bottom.
I don't want to shill it, but I would buy some just in case

>>4145159
Thanks, It really is. I would panic if developers would split or corporations would explicitly say that they will never use chainlink in their enviroment. As for now I am happy buying it at low rate and will keep buying until 1.2 mil or maybe more if price keeps falling.

>>3972273
yeah, I remember anshares. It was so recently I think 2 months ago and had more questions marks than a link. At inception, it had only 2 developers and a fucking cartoon ant for a logo.
The shitpost we had was amazing and in parallel with recent serge toilet conference meme.
The cries and butthurt were held then it rebranded to neo and skyrocketed to 40 dollars.
I hope even worse fudders bought at least 100 links just in case of moon ride

>>3844852
respectively my portfolio :
41.39% in Rise
19.55% in Ark
15.50% in Link
4.20% in Neo
3.25% in Waves
2.69% in pivx
2.29% in TAAS

fun fact : I bought ark at 0.18 and pivx at 0.60. I spent 1/3 on ark and 2/3 pivx. I thought pivx will hit dash hard. Now I feel like digamarine. I should have bought 2/3 arks