/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>10419759
I'd stay away because this is a classic noob trap investment. FunFair is 100% undoubtedly a legit product; they have deployed a real working state channel on both testnet and mainnet and are in the process of obtaining casino partnerships.

That being said, FUN is purely a utility token. Gamblers will buy FUN, gamble, then sell FUN immediately. The incentive to hold FUN is extremely low.

>>10373782
> once the infrastructure exists it will be much simpler
Yes, once it exists it will be simpler. But what FUN needs is either direct USD to FUN or for token exchange to be so simple and quick that it's not a hassle to turn BTC or ETH into FUN. None of that is happening for at least a year, maybe more. Which is why this token is bleeding in favor of more immediately successful products.

>>10373921
Jez San on Telegram has actually said that they're looking into temporary locked rates for games using stablecoin integration, so that you can use FUN in the background but gamble in terms of USD (and also avoid price fluctuation while you're in the state channel). I really don't know what to tell you. Sorry you don't know shit about the very project you're shilling. Pic related.