/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>8324778
weakest fud i think i have ever seen in my life

>>8273023
kek nice fud

>>8163421
Yes.
>basically everything paid for
>you get paid but won't have much to spend it on if you're frugal and dont drink
>opportunity for traveling
>once you leave you're a veteran for life and get discounts

>>8144453

>>8103169
>>8103219
>reddit meme

>>8097972
>>8097772

Monkey

>>8044063
>>8044095
wait til he finds out who the bogs are... he thinks the jew bankers are bad

>>7998561
>not an argument
>LOL
you have to go back

>>7984988
>this shit website
>this site is an echo chamber of Linkies
you have to go back
along with this pleb >>7969635

>>7972898
>>7972934
>>7972955
>>7973002
>>7973131
Wow, had to professionally shut down a project in unchartered market territory because of regulatory risks outside his control. Just like most successful startup founders who failed because of risks outside of their control.
That's increased my confidence in him as a founder.
Thanks, just bought 100k.
>Co-founder conflict
Wow, unheard of in the startup world. Sure glad I sold my apple stock in 1985 because Jobs was being an asshole.
>bad history
kek. Like literally every fucking startup founder if you dig deep enough
>>7972931
I think you missed the point about it being a decentralized oracle network, and I think you're overestimating how much power a handful of colluding nodes could have. The users will have much more power in being able to choose high-rep nodes, regardless of the total "marketcap"

Don't get me wrong, it's definitely not something to at least be aware of, but it seems blown out of proportion.

And I just don't think the "security" of an existing network is relevant here. The tamper-proofness of the I/O is what is at stake. ETH would have to start from square one to solve that problem, they can't just piggyback on it's underlying protocol and "large marketcap".
However, LINK CAN actually piggyback on other smart contract platforms and protocols, which makes me confident that it can survive the initial phase it needs to get through before becoming more established, and its network effects kick in

>>7950822

>>7930102
>token economics are weak
>open sourced
>mfw
>>7929980
Short of the Sergey, Rory, Thomas and all the devs literally switching projects and doing another ICO, pretty much no.
No other project could have got this in stealth mode. FUD spam is getting stronger. Previous nolinkers unironically buying LINK. Price is STILL up from conference.
>>7930188
Checked
And exactly. Pandora's box has been opened, and the community will now be providing the rocket fuel for the network to be launched. Once its established in just one particular vertical, its multiple reinforcing networking effects will continue to expand it into adjacent markets, and propel it to andromeda
Feels good to be a linkie, lads

>>7909952
lol, making a decision based on an ancient FUD copypasta. Not gonna make it

>>7903365
>why not just copy-paste an entire, established network, it's infrastructure and its participants.
>>7903360
>https://multicoin.capital/2018/01/17/an-overview-of-stablecoins/
Nice find. I like BTS, and I'm also holding some JNT for fun. But like they meintioned, they're going to need a solution like ChainLink to make any possible stablecoin solution work.
Just like that post in LINKTrader:

>As you can tell, I am bullish about ChainLink. Often in crypto, the old saying about how the guy selling shovels in a gold rush is the one to get rich. Well, I believe PSD2 is another gold rush and ChainLink is the first in the door selling the shovels, the diggers, and the whole wash plant.
Now, along with PSD2, add all these other trends and necessary developments that we're seeing, like stablecoins

>>7870571
>not reading the whitepaper, or even secondary summaries
>>7870527
10x which price? Got 41k of the chad coins, if it gets to fucking $1.5 - 2.00 I'm happy
I'll be even more happy if it BTFO coinbase

>>7862539
kek, they were saying the same thing about ANS even when it was quite well established at $10:

https://yuki.la/biz/2531774#p2532771

>Holy shit this is dumping hard tomorrow. So many retards here.
>Alright I won't be giving anymore advise to the likes of you. Enjoy losing your money.

Same shit, different season. Sure, we have a long way to go to reach there, but don't be fucking sour grapes lad

>>7856141
>Biz

>>7853144
>masternodes
>no reward

>>7826109
>>7826176

Sure is /r9k/ in here...

>>7795350
are you just quoting american psycho anon

>>7785550
why the fuck would i buy a centralized coin for any other reason than to flip for profit
is that what this is about, anon? why do you even act like ripple has anything at all on req, chainlink, or bitcoin cash?

also
>digital gold: bitcoin
lol this is how you know that this is a troll post
miners are gonna mine bitcoin cash, you dingwad
bitcoin legacy is deincentivizing mining by offloading transaction processing to off-chain nodes
this isn't even a short-term solution, as it is literal fucking centralization that entrusts all the transactions in a few nodes, and if the pricks at blockstream decided that they didn't want you or anyone else accessing your "digital gold", they could just shut down the lightning network nodes, and then you would have to pay thousands and thousands of dollars to make a single transaction
offloading transaction off-chain certainly isn't a fucking long term solution, either; what the hell is gonna be the point in running miners when there's no more bitcoin left to mine? in satoshi's bitcoin, mining after the unmined supply was exhausted propped up the network's value through facilitating transactions—so, what does core have going for it now? it's doomed to fail in the end; bitcoin core went from having actual value with no foreseeable end, to now having value propped up by thin air when mining is over. bitcoin cash doesn't have this problem, as it keeps everything on-chain and economically sound. i don't buy your shit about core being "digital gold" whatsoever in this sense; it's digital gold that is going to totally deplete its financial incentive to mine at some point in the next 150 years, and thus, will have no backing—and will lose every reason to exist at that point.

>>7790826
>implying that isnt tap water
>implying that isnt caramel popcorn
>implying that isnt good american black coffee