[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance

Search:


View post   

>> No.24703283 [View]
File: 168 KB, 684x900, 1600010682329.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
24703283

>>24703263

>> No.24431395 [View]
File: 168 KB, 684x900, 1600010682329.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
24431395

>>24431370
Uranium stonks really haven't done much.

I see people advising to buy them, but I don't really see how it's worth it over gold/silver miners desu.

>> No.24264280 [View]
File: 168 KB, 684x900, uranium estimates.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
24264280

bump

>> No.24064016 [View]
File: 168 KB, 684x900, 1600360625649.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
24064016

>>24063963
Uranium miners dude, ask in /pmg/

>> No.23977057 [View]
File: 168 KB, 684x900, 1603421277049.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
23977057

>>23976473
How is the movement of Uranium? I have been saving lists of potential plays I've been meaning to look at, but been too tied up with Gold/Silver for any serious considerations.

Aren't we still years away from a recovery demanding a substantial uptick in energy consumption? Or are we betting on Biden green spending for some upwards action ahead of schedule?

>> No.23710211 [View]
File: 168 KB, 684x900, 1603421277049.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
23710211

>>23710138
Right.

So anyhow, it was brought up before Gallium and Uranium may be smart future investments for a China VS America showdown. Personally I think a Biden win would result in a ACTUAL WAR(just not with China), while Trumps would be a kind of Cold War posturing and flexing. What are some other metals Americans will need to catch up on for manufacturing might to be returned to them?

>> No.23456478 [View]
File: 168 KB, 684x900, 1600138101604.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
23456478

I wish nuclear wasn't so far away.

Maybe after this tech stuff is over I will keep my money safe in nuclear stocks.

Will be chad to get rich off nuclear.

>> No.23304430 [View]
File: 168 KB, 684x900, 1600138101604.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
23304430

Here is picture 1 to 2 months old some anon posted about nuclear

>> No.22840556 [View]
File: 168 KB, 684x900, 1600110090898.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
22840556

>>22840460
I saved this from last time he was here.

>> No.22636091 [View]
File: 168 KB, 684x900, ura estimates.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
22636091

>>22636034
upside estimates (conservative ones too)

>> No.22598750 [View]
File: 168 KB, 684x900, 1600138101604.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
22598750

Yo, where my uranium Chad's at?

>> No.22572211 [View]
File: 168 KB, 684x900, 1600138101604.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
22572211

Wow these threads are just as shit during the day as they are at night.

Who here a nuclear chad?

>> No.22537018 [View]
File: 168 KB, 684x900, 1600138101604.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
22537018

>>22536959
China is ramping up production of reactors right now. US will follow get on in UUUU and UEC quickly.

Here is this too

>> No.22534439 [View]
File: 168 KB, 684x900, 1600138101604.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
22534439

Tell me if I should buy UEC premarket?

I dont want to fomo in later..

>> No.22527829 [View]
File: 168 KB, 684x900, 1600138101604.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
22527829

>>22527733
Here is what anon posted. I still need to look at it more.

>> No.22497913 [View]
File: 168 KB, 684x900, 1600110090898.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
22497913

>>22497890
Reposting image from last thread

>> No.22497509 [View]
File: 168 KB, 684x900, 1600110090898.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
22497509

>>22497463
Here's a list of uranium companies if you change your mind.
>credit goes to /pmg/

>> No.22487835 [View]
File: 168 KB, 684x900, uranium.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
22487835

>>22487799

>> No.22464203 [View]
File: 168 KB, 684x900, uranium estimates.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
22464203

>>22464188
some other anon shilled them very convincingly at the end of last thread, pic related

>> No.22458066 [View]
File: 168 KB, 684x900, ura estimates.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
22458066

>>22457978
Estimates for value of uranium stonks

>> No.22380974 [View]
File: 168 KB, 684x900, uranium estimates.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
22380974

>>22380810
this could be helpful

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]