/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>7688708

>pic related

That's why this stuff was built - it's why any of you're here speculating - anyone who says it's not important is an unadulterated idiot who doesn't seriously know what this situation is because they don't even see why it was started.

>For PPT

As far as PPT - I still think it's still far and away able to use it's 9-month headstart to hit sufficient network to out-compete its competitors because they're not in fact offering the same service -

However if you'd like a little hedge against that legal risk, you'd put 10% of whatever you'd allocated to PPT in PPP - it's not the same service per se however it can easily be sort of transformed into it whilst it still has (as far as we know) a clean record - because this is thing desu this is still all speculation sooner or later you'll find the rubber hits the road and use-cases / standard issue business stuff affects the price, you have no true due diligence just yet scanning dev teams / white papers and road maps on promotional sites.

>>4947735

Yeah there was nothing which could have served as a horse in Sub Saharan Africa...