/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>50526196
you sure?

>>50273739
Delusional. None of those things will affect the token price, Chainlink is not meant to be an investment that appreciates.

>>50160318
Do you not read white papers of projects you’re interested in?

>>49712068

$6 is a bit steep for a cup of coffee. Maybe next year with the rate inflation is increasing.

>>49532370
you are holding the wrong asset

Because sergay had the great idea of launching the project claiming it must not go above the price of a cup of coffee for it to function, then backpeddled and are trying to rewritte history implying this never happened.

>>29048774
It's way overpriced already.

>>28133203
we may have finally stabilized and now we can rest easy now our coins will retain their value in perpetuity

Because the coin has to have the price of a cup of coffee to function. What where they thinking? lfmao

Why the fuck would you hold a token that says on the whitepaper that the token must be worth a cup of coffee? lmfao

>>24682609
>he hasn't read the whitepaper

I'm aware that this is considered FUD at this point, but it bothers me that the whitepaper literally mentions the price hitting a ceiling *below* where we're at right now. Doesn't that make LINK overpriced? Has Sergey announced something to explain why this wouldn't be the case since?

>>21304825
READ THE WHITE PAPER AND GET OUT NOW!!!!

I'm aware that this is considered dead FUD at this point, but it bothers me that the whitepaper does literally mention hitting a price ceiling at about where we're at right now. Has Sergey explained why this wouldn't be the case?

>>20018106
it's like you didn't even read the whitepaper

All LINK shills need to realize that Sergey never intended having a high priced Link. LINK only goes on speculative value, but if LINK ever recieves this mainsteam global adoption you all want, then link must stabilize at an intended price.

>>/biz/thread/15099703

>>17328272
Do your own research.

How can the price of chainIink go any higher if it is meant to be stabalized at the price of a cup of coffee?
This is absurd. A starbucks coffe is only $2.
Even a iced quad espresso with splash of heavy cream, extra ice in a venti cup is only $3.25 after tax

>>17152392
because LINK, never mooned once before 2019. Thats what Linkies do not realize. They will never ever know the the horrid ROI of LINK during 2017, during december, when everything but fucking LINK mooned. LINK only went to $1.40 during the 2018 alt bullrun, while everything else was fucking 20x (how i made my money). LINK's ATH for 2 years straight was $1.40 which was fucking nothing. then it went down and fucked off to 17 cents for 2 years, and it took Not just SWIFT, but fucking GOOGLE partnership to make it finally fucking moon.

>>17152437
sats mean nothing to USD. LINK tanked sub $2 in fall. do not deny this.

you new fags do not know what mooning is because you were around for 2017, when LINK was giant laughing stock. LINK never even 10x yet. but because of a fucking google partnership that only makes it 5x, you act like its the holy grail of gains.

>>17152182
>ITS A STABLE COIN
Unironically true. Wish more people would read the white paper.

>>16980417
Factually correct. Brainlets who didn’t read the white paper are going to regret not listening.

>>16878944
This. Dumb linkies don’t even know how to read their own white paper. It was always meant to be a cup of coffee stablecoin.

>>16822741
This. It’s in the white paper.