[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance

Search:


View post   

>> No.58538347 [DELETED]  [View]
File: 398 KB, 1503x2004, 1688451198092128.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
58538347

it's unironically happening this summer

>> No.58427639 [View]
File: 398 KB, 1503x2004, 1621177934038.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
58427639

>>58427636

>> No.58373889 [View]
File: 398 KB, 1503x2004, 1687851089831348.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
58373889

They realized no one was willing to use it even when it cost the same as other bridges, regardless of extra security. So now they're essentially giving it away FOR FREE. It's extremely aggressive. And this means they don't have plans to make CCIP profitable for years to come, which is another blackpill, because it means more dumping to fund operations, hoping they can corner volume marketshare for the long-term, and then maybe they can turn up revenue a decade from now.

The only con, from retail user perspective, is it's also not the fastest, because retards value instant speed over security. They will delegate instant txs via CCIP to third-party LPs projects, which will be the ones pocketing the juicy fees.

So now it's not only the most secure bridge, but also the cheapest. Which is crazy when you think about it.

This brings the question: Who would still use garbage like wormhole and L0 when CCIP is now better AND cheaper? Another blackpill here: realizing there's no actual usage for bridges anyway. It's all either jeets farming for airdrops, or VCs faking volume on their VC backed bridges. It's literally all fake and gay volume.

>> No.55734143 [View]
File: 398 KB, 1503x2004, 1621177934038.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
55734143

>>55734120
Sergey's dick was so fucking big that he easily penetrated her from behind with her sitting on his lap. She arched up so she could take as much of it as she could and they started to fuck right there next to me. It shocked me how easily her petite little body accomodated that horse cock of his. Sergey pounded her in positions that i physically CANNOT do for over an hour - I have no idea how many times she came - she was even in tears a few times (though she never once told him to stop).

He asked her if she was on the pill and when she said she was on the patch, he told her that he was going to cum inside of her to mark her - which only made her cum again! when he finally came, he had Amy on her back, her legs shaking violently as they both came together - and true to his word, Sergey dumped his seed deep up inside my girlfriend's pussy right in front of me. But fuck - he didn't even lose his damn hard on! They fucked for about another 40 minutes and he came twice more. Amy was a wreck by the time we all went to bed.

I will never forget the look on her face - like she was afraid of him and in love with him all at once - the whole time they fucked. She later told me that there were no words to describe it - it was incredible but even that didn't seem enough. To my knowledge they never fucked again and Amy and I dated for about another year before we finally broke up. I always wondered if she ended up with him or some other big dick guy.

But one thing I know for sure - she NEVER fucked me like she did Sergey and the things she said about Sergey - the way she looked at him - and the way she was around him after that night (almost shy and meek) convinced me that a big dick makes a difference.

Amy told me that she "HAD to respect him" even if she didn't like him...and that she almost felt like he "had a right to her". So there ya go.

>> No.55697675 [View]
File: 398 KB, 1503x2004, 1621177934038.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
55697675

Dear Mr. I'm-Too-Good-to-Update-My-Fans
This'll be the last message I ever send your ass
It's been three months and still no github update・I don't deserve it?
I bought three bitcoins worth of Chainlink,
Each time half the value before it,
So this is my shitpost I'm sending you, I hope you read it
I'm on Binance right now, about to sell all your shit for 10 Request,
Hey, Sergey, I drank a fifth of russian vodka, you dare me to dump?
You know the song by Wutang Clan
"Torture" about that guy that gets pumped, with a hot hanger, up in his rear hump?
thats kinda how this is, you could've pumped to save me from dumping,
Now it's too late, I'm ten times down now, and I'm drowsy
And all I wanted was a lousy update or a tweet,
I hope you know I deleted all of your meme pics out my C:,
I loved you, Sergey, we could've been rich together ・think about it!
You ruined it now, I hope you can't sleep
And you meme about it
And when you meme
I hope you can't sleep and you Airbnb about it
I hope your shitcoin eats at you
And you can't breathe without me
See, Sergey..--shut up, REQ! I'm tryin' to talk
Hey, Sergey, that's my new shitcoin screamin' in the trunk
But I didn't dump her, she gives me gains, she aint like you
舛ause if she dumps on me, ill have nothing left, and suicide too,
Well, gotta go, I'm almost at the pump now
Oh shit, I forgot, how am I supposed to sell when this shit is scamming me out?

>> No.55607017 [View]
File: 398 KB, 1503x2004, 1667554765360822.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
55607017

CCIP should be pure(?) profit for nodes (gas fees directly covered by users, no API overhead subscriptions), and scale with usage/txs (flat fee for messaging, % for token transfers + a 10% charge for payments in non LINK assets).

CCIP represents a major shift in that previously chainlink oracles indirectly enabled/captured value by being used in the backend of third-party dapps (hence why we had to use terms like TVS instead of TVL, or how pricing between CLL and dapps had to be conducted via off-chain deals, subsidies, shared cost model between different users).

With ccip, chainlink value model goes from indirect to direct, ie the 'universal gas' meme, being direct on-chain interactions, direct fee payments without backroom subsidies, etc. While it's still used in the back-end of dapps like snx and aave currently, with reference bridges ccip might soon become a front-end layer.

Imagine for a moment that ccip was a brand new project with a brand new token. Everyone would be salivating to get in.

But it's not a brand new project. It's a subset of a project that already established its monopoly as the de facto crypto infrastructure metalayer, that enabled the defi boom, never got exploited, +700 employees, secured its long term treasury, etc.

It's critical to understand that the price feeds, with their indirect value model, act as monopoly establishing loss leaders, for ccip to generate direct value, without additional trust assumption for +1000 dapps.

The only crypto project directly working with the biggest financial institutions like SWIFT and the DTCC, BNY, etc.

Now combined with the eventual implementation of staking for ccip, this means this direct value capture would flow to the token holders and stakers. And ccip would only be a subset of the larger chainlink network, with data feeds starting to generate more revenue like the gmx deal or the build airdrops.

I don't think any of this is priced in or well understood by the community/market yet.

>> No.51688173 [View]
File: 398 KB, 1503x2004, 16BED280-46ED-450D-866C-954C2C3042E2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
51688173

Coping and seething probably

>> No.51499926 [View]
File: 398 KB, 1503x2004, 2896EC74-6B04-490D-AB78-F9374958ADCF.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
51499926

>>51499904
You hold LINK

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]