/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>56960935
Suck my big fat blocks, faggot.

L2 is literally nothing but third party payment processors, you were fooled. Not that it was hard.

>>56930217
Would rebut this >>56930230
Again odd.

>>56930237
No original copy of the this draft exists. The link in the email is dead.

>>56930249
See pic.

>>56930253
Forum posts from 12 years ago is a low standard of evidence. I don't remember shit I posted from a week ago. Besides he's right. Bitcoin isn't like those systems although I may borrow from them.

>>56930260
See above. It isn't the same system/remembering everything you said over a decade ago is asking for a lot.

>>29938569
You’re a faggot who clearly doesn’t give a single fuck about the tech let alone the Bitcoin project

>>29859676
That isn't sarcasm, you retard. It's mockery.

>>29307068
>data centers
Oh god anything but that!

>>18717925
Yes

>>18717942
>>18718093
It scales. Read Satoshi.

>>17426414
100s of corporations and 100s of governments is decentralized. This doesn't require your laptop in your mothers basement.

I don't give a shit if you think 100 or 300 thousand dollars a year for storage is a bunch of money when each block is $50,000 ($250 BSV) - $5,000,000 ($25,000 BSV).

Large data centers were always the scaling direction of Bitcoin. The fact that you type that out as if it's some kind of argument tells me you haven't done your research. Stop listening to fucking idiots like Peter McCorecuck.

>>17406345
>Yes they are, that’s the entire fucking point

Wrong.

>>17360027
>The reality is that Bitcoin was never structurally sound to scale

How long is going to take to get all you retards out of Bitcoin? Shit is dragging on way too fucking long.

>>16561482
>But then again bsvtards don't understand how crypto really works.

Ok, Boomer. ASICs are specialized CPUs and the more you have the more voting power you have. Please spare us a reply with more of your low IQ nonsense.

>>16545509
It's Bitcoin, you tell me.

>>16434927
Large scale always involved massive infrastructure.

>>14414278
I don't know what else to tell you, read this nChain propaganda.

>>14146207
Indeed. Bitcoin was never intended to be run out of cucksheds at scale.

>>14100040
This. Look at this shit from nChain on scaling. Fucking server farms?! Give me a fucking break.

>>13908951
>>13908989
Forgot pic

>>13890776
>im still talking about the metanet thing here please dont deflect!
Yeah so was I. Metanet is still transactions, dummy.

You sync with the network via miners. I'm not going to argue about you're retarded raspberry pi node. If you haven't gotten by now you're not going to and its all so tiresome to explain this shit for the billionth time on /biz/. So here's some nChain propaganda that just came out, for (You).

>>13709943
Exactly. Check out this nChain propaganda trying to tell people scaling will mean large data centers. How the fuck are poorfags ever going to a FULLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL NODE?

>>13704839
Would explain why you hate nChain and Satoshi so much.

Look at these Lightning stats, greg.
https://1ml.com/statistics

Dumping nChain propaganda.

>>13558597
>Satoshi was wrong

BLOCKSTREAM'S PURPOSE IS TO FORM A PARASITIC LAYER OVER BITCOIN TO CONTINUE THE GOLDSMITH SCHEME
>AFTER LN HAS SUFFICIENTLY REDUCED THE PROFITABILITY OF MINING AND MINERS GO BANKRUPT THE HUBS (BANKS) WILL BUY OUT ALL THE MINERS, ASSERTING CONTROL OVER THE NEW WORLD MONEY SYSTEM FOREVER
HUBS WORK EXACTLY LIKE CONTEMPORARY BANKING SYSTEMS (READ THE LN WHITEPAPER) MAKING ALL THE CENSORSHIP RESISTANCE OF BITCOIN DISAPPEAR

>on scaling

>>13463769
Sounds like a bunch of fake and gay inflation schemes that a banking interest would pull. All of which is easily avoided by scaling the chain as intended, but we all know that would cut a parasite like AXA out of the market.