/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>17603948
Imagine not buying it knowing its funded by Twitter to host Twitter.

>>17485582
I really think you arent following this. Every fud thrown has been debunked. You are parroting the fud. I'm not a fucking idiot. I've combed over everything. The bitcointalk thread shows they were talking about pillars and satellites before the SQ tweets. Also IF you actually follow it and not be a non thinking pleb you would know SQ have constantly mirrored tweets connecting to Zenon. We didn't even know Jack had plans to develop decentrlized social media as we were wondering what a dapp platform could be for bitcoin. Then Jack tweeted this plans. How can you plebs ever get rich believing every fud that is designed to make you poor. Kek...

For those who want to research Zenon deeper and the links with Twitter that shows they are funding and created it.

https://pdfhost.io/v/vL8H3xJ4_ogreportseptember_3pdf.pdf

Twitter funded dapp platform. Let that sink in.

>>17424152
No. An Ethereum.

>>17422732


Nice try Negro.

>>17410784
Square Crypto is Jack Dorseys wing of his Square company to work on crypto related projects. If you look Zenon joined in early 2018 but the account lay dormant till March 21st when it made its first tweet. A few hours later SQ made its first tweet and has made a load of cryptic tweets that point directly at Zenon. It's a million to one shot they arent connected.

Zenon is a small anon team with no ico that is a dapp platform. If you dont get the significance of this then you are a mongoloid.

>>17393881

He is. But you cant host Social media on Bitcoin can you.

>>17369043
Cause he wants to decentralize Twitter and make a standard for dapps cause he loves crypto. It's not for profit on his part. There was no ico. Look what happened to Zuckerberg. Being anon is a very wise move. They want people to know but they also want to have plausible deniability. Jack has said he is doing this already btw.

>>17184764
Debunked 100 times. Try harder. Thats a hired guy who only works on lightening network. Can Twitter run on Lightning network. Please answer? Or shoo shoo

>>17174795
That's debunked. He is a side project hired guy who works solely on lightening network. You are a lying fudder as you know Twityer cant run on Lightening network. You prove the planned fud us real and you repeat the same shit.

>>17161131
Correct. Just like Jack said

>>17155773
But debunked sir. Jack can not run social.media on lightning network. Lol

>>17153882
All debunked. That new hire is for lightening network. That's a seperate part of Square Crypto. Also you can't host social media on lightening network you fucking lying Pakistani.

>>17149958
Jack Dorsey HAS already said he is developing it you mouth breather. Why the fuck if you aremt doing it for profit do you need to go public? They gave clues that mean it's a definite match so what more do you want? Anon means Dorsey has none of the bs and legal mess that Zuckerberg walked into.

Firstly this is Jack Dorsey introducing his plans.

>>17115608
Pivx is a placeholder for distribution. Whitepaper is imminent and it's going to be peer reviewed like Cordana.

I clearly posted what Jack said about building a protocol that could host social media. Do you think that's possible in Bitcoin. And yes he is Bitcoin focused. As a currency.