/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>16904008
STIFF

STIFF

>>16883800
>So what's it mean for my linkies?
Link is obsolete, as there won't be a need for an oracle between blockchains, as there is only going to be one global ledger, and BSV will connect outside of blockchain without LINK's help. LINK is literally worthless, and even if it would pump, Sergey still can dump 285 000 000 LINKies on our heads, and nChain owns all of the important patents for crypto, including oracles.

How do you cope with the fact that 2 days ago 10k link got more than 100BSV and now it barely gets you 50?

>>16847427
>>16847439
>>16847511
>>16847527
>>16847600
Typical link tard. Can't you see, that this tech is not going anywhere? There is going to be only ONE blockchain, and that's going to be BSV. There will be no need for an oracle between blockchains, and BSV will connect with the internet, banking, and everything else without LINK. Thanks to LINK I 15x my money, but now I'm 2.5x on BSV, and this train is only starting.

>>16845628
this

>>16845677
and this

>>16764241
>>16764275
>phoneposting
>"omg y u tak about us when we all over ur board shitting up the catalog i don get it??!!?!"

Kill yourself you fucking retarded schitzo.

>>16585509
>The point was obviously to prove Chainlink can inherently provide flawless data integrity thanks to decentralization
>decentralizing data originating from a centralized source
>shoehorning a middleman for the sole purpose of JSON parsing

Do you even understand programming?

LIFE OF SERGEY

PART I
>born fat
>an ugly slav
>not really smart but somewhat persuasive
>timid, will never fuck prime pussy
>no chance in life
>...unless he runs a scam and steals millions for gullible investors!

PART II
Calls his pal, Ari Juels.
>hey Ari, can you write a white paper so I can raise some funds through an ICO? Something to do with "the smart contract," or whatever.
>ok, sergey. I've been working on something about oracles, but I don't think we need a token to run it
>then make a god damn token, damnit!
>b- but Sergey, what do I gain from doing this?
>I will use ICO money to purchase Town Crier. You will become a millionaire
>Ok, Sergay. Let's call it Chainlink.
>sounds good. Whatever, I don't give a fuck. We need to ride that ICO wave. YOLO
>YOLO. But how are you going to run the company after the Town Crier acquisition?
>How about I hold a premine?
>Are you sure, Sergay? Aren't you afraid of being seen as a scammer?
> IDGAF. JUST PRINT ME SOME FUCKING TOKENS.
>O-OK Sergay, how about 10% of the total supply?
>WTF ARI, U KIDDING RIGHT? LET'S DO 65%. I'll shill this shit on 4chan. You'll see. They believe in anything there. I'll create an army of shills who will work for free and shill my suit 24/7. HAHAHAHA

$1 waiting room

How do you say "Sergey, pump my Chainlink bags!" in your language?

I hope you're selling, retards... fuel is gone, we retrace to $2.70 over the next 2 weeks.

Chainlink is a blatant scam. You know these randoms shitcoins that pop up into the top 100 from time to time with 0 volume? That's when one pajeet trades 1 coin for 1000$ to another pajeet and the marketcap is then that x circ supply. Well, with Chainlink it's not different. It's all wash trading to keep the price up and low volume too. Chainlink (LINK) is currently at rank 28 on CMC but when you sort by volume it drops to rank 43-45. That means that the marketcap of LINK should be more in the range of coins at rank 43-45 which is 200,000,000$ and that would make a way more reasonable price of 57 cents. Remember, artificial prices can't keep up forever so we will head back to the mean of 60 cents soon again which is the natural range for LINK as it was for years now. It was always the resistance that the REAL price couldn't break. Since mainnet launch we've witnessed a huge pump and dump and everything above the 60 cents mark is fake. Makes you wonder... why does the official telegram ban anyone who starts discussing price?

>>14048857
easiest 100 link i ever made

What's wrong? You mad bro?

>>13985299
heh, nothing personell kiddo

heh, nothing personell kiddo

>>12756599

Why do I keep getting these goddamn dubs, I don't give even care enough about this shit website or its inhabitants to justify running that dumbass program to time it. The stat's behind it are actually really cool though.

> muh markov chains

*WWWWWWOOOOONNNNNNKKKKK*

>>12509351
No you don't

already priced in

hehe, nothing personell kiddo

>>11934011

What wallet do you recomend to store 650 000 000 links? I think maybe I should diversify to more than one wallet. Right now I have them on binance, but I don't trust gooks. I had a bad experience with them as a toddler

Where the fuck did the volume go?