/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>50872528
Do you think Coinmetro, Kevin or XCM to be still operating a year from now? I give this entire farce a few months max before they suddenly shutdown or get (((((hacked))))) so that they can exit scam with all your money. Imagine believing in them being aware of this:
>ridiculous price floor (we call this manipulation)
>still no volume
>more MARs assets being removed than added
>poorly designed UI
>poorly designed staking rates and rewards for holders
>tokenized bonds meme ended up being a simple idea inapplicable in reality
>complete lack of marketing and promotion for their platform
>unusable website, buggy and unreliable mobile app/mail services
>weak staying power compared to competitors like Binance, Kucoin or Kraken
>government and tax friendly
>will get outshined by DEXes as they get better in a space reputed to be against state regulations
>weekly AMAs where nothing of relevance is said
>poor OPSEC by the people in charge making the platform vulnerable to attacks (not once, not twice, but THRICE)

I believe I made my point clear enough now. It's a miracle it managed to rise that high. All of the elements above will lead anyone to the obvious conclusion: the whole thing wasn't sustainable to begin with. I can count the entire user base of Coinmetro with 4 hands worth of fingers. Daily volume is astonishingly low, and the tokenomics are flawed: it's just a smokescreen to hide that it's actually a ponzi/money laundering scheme. XCM cannot be valued above 60 cents. XCM holders are now tasked to try their best to recruit as many people as possible into the exchange to keep the money and the rewards flowing in, otherwise the house of cards inevitably falls upon itself without warning as soon as the tokens bought by Kevin Murcko/the exchange ALL GET SOLD AT ONCE to break even. Let me repeat myself here : the XCM token CANNOT be valued more than 60 cents per token, if not less.