/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>16551710
okay in all honesty, my response to you was pretty good—you should certainly get the picture, especially if you understand the concept that you've outlined in >>16552209; there's an enormous system of regulations that make it damn well impossible for someone starting out from the bottom with no connections to work their way out of the rut that is trying to attract and target customers and then meet their demands, while trying to perform legal gymnastics as cheaply and efficiently as possible AND doing all of this on whatever percentage of your earnings are left after taxes, minus your living expenses. most people—and importantly, people who ARE capable of the standalone tasks that are inseparably relevant to running a profitable business—can't do it.
with this in mind, i'll get to the point—referring back to >>16551710, you say that "wages are artificially kept low"—and what i gather from you, given that you refute the simple fact that the value of the dollar can change and that you haven't hit me with any solutions or arguments but somehow think that you're in a position where you can call me a retard, i'm inclined to believe that you think that the minimum wage isn't high enough. am i correct?

>>16557909
this isn't an argument—it's not even well-written. lose the attitude, cunt.