/biz/ - Business & Finance

>an investment that needs you to own 0.005% of the supply is a good investment
no

it doesn't make sense. In some ways for me I have to concede it's bullish.
BSV is literally the single worst performer out of the top 100 but it is obviously the only thing that scales.
I think link is shit but it's shit performance might imply otherwise

take xvg for example, did a 13,000x, was made in a garage, was hacked twice.
Link is being promoted by the same organisation that has influenced the prince of england and prime minister of england to advocate for the reseting of their nations fundamental legal constitution, yet it doesn't moon

your x axis should say hubris.
imagine not diversifying when your make it amount is finite and so many coins go from 1000x - 10,000x

think of linkies who constantly argue to only go all in link, why the fuck would you do that when if link is what it claims to be you should expect it to at least eclipse xvg which did ~13,000x meaning even an $1000 investment would be sufficient. Instead now they have missed endless opportunitys for no benefit

no

absolutely

>>28068911
nonsense. link could be 100x the price it is today and it wouldn't be unprecedented

>>27867824
the most bearish thing in these threads is the people defending links shit performance

nano was objectively the biggest moon mission of all time and it's probably about to run again

It would need to go 5291x.

Consider xvg 2as made in someones garage and has been hacked multiple times. While an international think tank atempting to destroy capitalism backed by arguably the largest economy in the world endorses link.
Even if link did 100x its current price today it wouldnt have an unprecedented return for crypto

>>26554081
>going all in on anything
Retard

funds are safe

Yep

>>26426510
very possible. In fact link is the most hyped least mooned token ever