/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>52984917
Basically this. Nothing can compete fundamentally with BSV - it just has terrible press and awareness. Simply put, your epic L1 bags, their 5 year roadmap promises they'll never accomplish, is what BSV is doing right now.

Is the market finally coming to terms with BSV being the real Bitcoin and that
>muh store of value
was 2017 segwit fork cope?

>>52941110
Meanwhile, BSV outperforms whatever shit youre holding during this slaughter

>>52920700
>Bitcoin is an idea, it's not supposed to scale

>>52914759
>we have all moved far beyond bitcoin.
Your L2s roadmap promises are fake, and alraedy being done on Bitcoin (bsv)

>>52913064
Yes you're correct in your entire thesis. I think Visa/Mastercard went directly to their AXA overlords basically in desperation because they could see, far before the general public, that real bitcoin was their nail in the coffin. Bitcoin outperformed them in every way, and would inevitably take their entire online marketshare, then eventually their in-store PoS marketshare. Merchants would have 0 incentives to use their services any longer in comparison ti Bitcoin. No other crypto comes relatively close to original btc, which is why the mainstream has no problem touting them and partnering with them - they're not a threat.

>>52891997
Yes.
>>52892017
Yes.

>>52864163
>>52864163
That's because "bitcoin" in no way resembles the whitepaper. It was never meant, nor designed to be, a "SoV" or inflation hedge - which is why it fails tremendously at it. Buy BSV, withdraw to a wallet, and log out for a few years. Simple as.

>>52852242
Oops, pic rel

>>52833376
This is the more interesting part of this than
>le epic gme squeeze
This could be the spark that gets people to research BSV. The argument has lay dormant since roughly 2015/16 - but the current crypto-sphere needs to realize that BTC was never made, nor designed to be a SoV, "inflation hedge", or whatever other cope. That's not it's intended purpose, and that's why it's failed at it. Newcomers were sold a lie, and ticker BTC has absolutely no use in its current state, and is completely worthless. It cant be used as p2p cash (its intended purpose), and it's clearly not a SoV or inflation hedge, which was a cope narrative started in 2018. Core could very realistically go sub-$100, as its only current use is speculative gambling, it has no underlying value. With research though, you'll understand Bitcoin (real) is the world-changing tech that was in a perpetual giga-bull market from inception. It will be resurrected.

>>52829529
BTC was never an "inflation hedge", that was a retarded narrative started in like 2018 after the forks, and BTC went with small blocks. It no longer had a usecase, it doesnt do anything. It was supposed to be p2p electronic cash that could support infinite scaling. The forks purposely made it useless and maxi's then scrambled for a narrative, which became "digital gold and SoV". That was never BTC objective, its not made to do that, it doesn't even make sense.

BSV is the ONLY Blockchain with speeds that are now, as of this month as fast as Visa/Mastercard.

It is NOT pre-mined ala XRP
All transactions are on the Base Layer unlike Lightning Network and BTC
It is Government and Jurisprudence compliant
Transactions are sub $0.01 and will only go lower
Can do smart contracts today
Can do anything that any other Blockchain can do, today
It is the original protocol set up by Satoshi Nakamoto

Look what the lead developer of BTC said this week
https://twitter.com/DocumentingBTC/status/1600964718524448768

Let it sink way down into you. There was never a need for the Segwit soft-fork.
It was done to keep block sizes small and to hobble Bitcoin so it could never compete with Credit Cards.

BSV

>>24460913
Define the real bitcoin

>>24105211
Bsv will be used. Fuck you israel

ITS STIFF IN HERE