Lemme let you in on a little trade secret that's been bamboozling you superstonkers.
8 sideways is ∞. So when in reference that there WILL be a sharp spike up to 800, then a stock split, and another stock split to 800; it's stating that the price will rise to ∞, then there will be a stock split, and another rise to ∞.
This should have happened starting with the original 4 for 1, however the DTCC intervened, processing it as a simple stock split rather than a dividend stock split. So another trigger, such as UBS or Kenny G failing margin requirements elsewhere, is required for "closure".
The 3 for 1 stock split (taking the number of shares to ~900m, just under the max cap of 1b) would be 4 + 3 = 7. Or 741. This is de wey. This can only occur during MOASS to increase gains for holders and increase the number of shorts that need to close. That's right, with a 3 for 1 splividend, as a recap, increases your 100 shares x ∞ to 300 x ∞ while increasing shorts liability by -100 x ∞ to -300 x ∞.
Do you also use GameStop as a bank?