/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>27756230
Oh yeah i forgot that
Unironically stakers are the most benefited on the AVAX scheme

>>26266299
you're completely delusional holy fuck
>>26265997
you'll keep on waiting forever, screencap this and make it your wallpaper; this the literal same FUD used when AVAX was worth $3 zzzzzzzzzz you niggers are lame
also VCs are a WAY smaller percent of the total token distribution, the public sale was larger and most VCs are big reliable organizations (pic related)
>>26266094
that's literally what happened last time
>>26266473
ok retard
i swear this kind of FUD is the worst ever, you're speaking nosense with no base whatsoever over an extremely innovative project for no reason.
if you're a paidshill, at least i hope you're getting paid well lmao because this is literally humiliating for you

>>26163474
the "VC scam" argument has been around since AVAX mainnet lol, and it's shit-tier fudding having into consideration that the seed sale was WAY smaller than the public sale, and they're reliable institutions (you can find em' on Avalanche's website), also the team tokens are vested for 5+ years lol.
The smart contract stuff is bullshit too, there are literally dozens of projects oriented to smart contracts currently being developed over Avalanche, plus all of the ETH smart contracts can be ported to AVAX, becoming cheaper and faster in the process.
the tech is already proven, it's backed by a fucking giga brain as Emin (a guy who has been around cryptos even before BTC) and Cornell University itself (Ivy league member and home of Chainlink), fuck even Vitalik has endorsed Avalanche lmao
the supply stuff has been a strong fudding point, but the biggest token release happened literally months ago and the price literally PUMPED (completely otherwise to what it was supossed to happen)
AVAX is legit, and those fudding replies have been around since the beginning, when AVAX was $3, they've been repeating the same stuff for MONTHS and not it's worth $13, w/ actual room to reach $200 this year, no joke.

>>24315346
>complains about december's unlock
>also the distribution is completely directed to stakers (pic related)

shit tier fud, not gonna work.

>>24231178
you could buy rn at $4 and then sell at $10k in 2030. You better change that mindset if you're looking for reliable profit.

>>24231196
>VC Scam
>Also the seed sale being smaller than the public sale (pic related)