/biz/ - Business & Finance

This post was true then, is it still true now? What do you thing /biz/?

>>54667342
There is so much shit waiting to be priced in for Chainlink. Unbelievable that 3.5 years later (and dozens of name drops by SWIFT, Forbes, Citi and many others) we are still in the same situation as pic rel. Infuriating. If I wasn't such a patient person I would've definitely missed out.

>>50894356
Since you asked nicely, Ill give you one.

>>50623821

>>50444137
WAGMI

>>30402180
>Anyone else looking forward to this board turning pink when LINK starts dumping?
Who is going to post them? Barely any newfags around that hold LINK. OGs from 2-3 years ago are all in 6 or 7 figure hell and have been through worse, so even if they are still lurking don't expect many pink wojaks from them.

IF LINK dumps, a few noLinkers will make threads about it to gloat and that will be it. Linkies are patiently biding their time.

>>28663912
https://www.coindesk.com/swift-sibos-blockchain-contest-winners
it was also an intellectual realization (realize that sounds conceited) of what was needed for the space to actually do something. i spent weeks going over the whitepaper, reading everything i could on apis. it was hard work.
also that link was a "biz shill coin" was actually part of the fud. in fact it was fudded here non-stop and on reddit to keep people who didn't read and research from buying or to make them sell early/switch in and out of tokens/coins

gee if only there were an entire decentralized financial ecosystem that's been shilled relentlessly on this board for the last 5 years. even after getting fucked in the ass with this gme shit the lemmings are too stupid to get it.

I know all the discussion of LINK is on Twitter now but do have a look at the dClimate annoucement.
Uses a DAO to certify external adaptors for the marketplace and is building out a USD frontend (which is how LINK will be used in future more broadly - people won't even know what Chainlink does).

>>26472947
too low iq

>>26066902
I kinda went off on a tangent there about new opportunities in crypto, but I feel the same as what anon here >>26065867 said about other disruptive emerging technologies later down the line. I guess the older you get the more you hold on to what you know, and we will probably not be any different when the time comes.

>>26066661
>>just because you understand something doesn't mean the masses of absolute retards do

>>26062065
Making psych evaluations over the internet might be even less suited to you than your current IT career is anon.

>just because something is obvious to you, does not mean it is in away way obvious to the heaving masses of absolute fucking retards who are throwing their money away in this market
Well goddamn, didn't that anon hit the nail on the fucking head. At least you reached the point where you attempt to do due diligence, so kudos for that.

>>24796267

pic related
the market is fucking stupid. but we're all going to be retired within a year or two so who cares

>>24483534
because people are fucking stupid

>>24245098
This is how I feel about RLC

>>24241967

>>24093582
initially the fud was to allow accumulation but also to keep reddit out of the project and make them buy at $10+
some of the fud was ingenious such as that link was a biz shill coin. this was spread to reddit and remained a dominant narrative until the spike to $20 earlier in year
now it continues but at much less intensity in order to keep newly arrived redditors into selling early or switching in and out of coins
link is the next link