/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>56337014
EVENTUALLY you lose, and the fact that so many people trade "successfully" is simply because they havent traded long enough. the vast majority of people are losing and not beating the average. its like seeing successful business people, or artists who make it seem easy and attainable. you dont see the millions of people who have failed.

pic related

>>53768431
Every single person in /smg/ trying to be a day trader will eventually lose most of their money.

IN EVERY TRADE, there is a winner and a loser. You have information. They have information. You have to be certain you know more. And most of the time you do not. Theres a reason why retail is considered stupid. But guess what, even if you are right, Wall Street still takes their cut.

Bogle-chads will always win in the end because you buy the entire market. Every active manager, day trader, hedge fund, bank etc. trades to discover prices and build the index. And bogle-chads buy it for 0.03 Bepis. Eventually the best stocks will rise and make most of the index, like Fang names. You don't have to time it, you don't have to chase hot sectors. Pic related.

>>53455411
that is unironically the winning strategy, passive index investing is the bogle-chad way. stock picking is a fucking joke, even "portfolio fund managers" can't beat the market pic related.

pay 0.03 BEPIS to buy the broad market and continually drip feeding into markets is the evidenced based way of winning

>>53191637
today i will remind them