/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>30066747
>DO NOT TRUST ANYONE WHO SUPPLIES A DATE EVEN THE MARCH 19TH SHIT. they expect a let down and if a date is promised and nothing happens they want people to sell.

That's not true. March 19 is an espoused date given the past trend of GME. I don't expect a let down and I don't want people to sell if I'm wrong. But that's the conclusion I came to and it so happens to match up with a bunch of $800 calls for the same time frame.

>A
GME doubles in price and begins to crab in that range for a week
>B, C
doubles again and begins a five day squeeze from $65 to $483
>D
gives one lesser peak before it starts a six day plummet back to roughly around where it started ($58) right before the squeeze
>E, F
GME just about doubles from ~$40 to~$100 and begins to crab, in a trend that resembles (A)

If it follows the same trend, then this will probably moon to ~$800 in about two weeks.

>>30012510
>>30020970
>>30021451
>A
GME doubles in price and begins to crab in that range for a week
>B, C
doubles again and begins a five day squeeze from $65 to $483
>D
gives one lesser peak before it starts a six day plummet back to roughly around where it started ($58) right before the squeeze
>E, F
GME just about doubles from ~$40 to~$100 and begins to crab, in a trend that resembles (A)

If it follows the same trend, then this will probably moon to ~$800 in about two weeks.


Any reason why it would go $1000+?

>A
GME doubles in price and begins to crab in that range for a week
>B, C
doubles again and begins a five day squeeze from $65 to $483
>D
gives one lesser peak before it starts a six day plummet back to roughly around where it started ($58) right before the squeeze
>E, F
GME just about doubles from ~$40 to~$100 and begins to crab, in a trend that resembles (A)

If it follows the same trend, then this will probably moon to ~$800 in about two weeks.