/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>4364165
Jesus Christ fine I'll tap into my pre-2014 hardcore libertarian self to both argue with you and give SOME validation to your attempted argument.

IF exposure to/use of ANIMTED CP can emphatically be shown to NOT result in increased offending by pedos then you could argue in favour of it being morally neutral. IF access to animated CP could be shown to actually decrease RL pedo offenses then it would be a moral imperative to argue in favour of it. If use of sexdolls modeled on pre-pubescent kids were shown to have similar impact, same rules apply.

However, there is absolutely NO morally sound argument - unless you are a fundamentalist AnCap (other 'anarchists' are just confused communists) - for legality of CP made using real kids as it's very production involves abuse of children and it's proposed legality/lax law enforcement provides ample profit incentive.