/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>15509131
I was hoping to commission you with Nico holding a Sharpie bullying a linkfag. You may draw her in any manner you wish as long as you hold onto the concept of bullying. You may use feet if you want, I know you like feet.

Reminder: There are people who watched this video and unironically thought "wow, this seems like a legit, safe investment

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T1pTweNiAzw

NORMIES LMAO

COSS is an absolute fucking joke, seriously. The price of the token will probably still go up simply due to the afterglow of Kucoin and people being fucking idiots.

The owner, Rune Evensen, is a known scammer. But you know what, the fact that he's a scammer isn't really important in this case, because I genuinely don't think he's trying to scam on this one. He's just fucking incompetent at running an actual business. The real lie of COSS is that it's not a security because you have to press a distribute button to get your dividends. This is ridiculous and another great example of Rune not having a fucking clue what he's talking about.

I don't think people are prepared for how big this is going to get.

Twitch integration will make this go absolutely ballistic. It's a built in shilling mechanism with an extremely wide reach. Like it or not, streamers are influential as fuck right now and they will all be incentivized to promote this.

10 billion market cap? Think bigger. Do you REALLY think a project headed by the creator of javascript will be anything lower than top 5?

>>5257117
>>5257051

Corecuck tears are so fucking sweet.

From a media perspective Cash has already won due to faster transactions and lower fees. Core proponents don't have a leg to stand on.

I'm confident XLM will match or exceed XRP's market cap sometime soon. But I DON'T think it will be tomorrow.

In fact, I suspect a small dump after tomorrow's conference. It's not actually a Stellar event, they're simply being featured at the launch of SatoshiPay so while it's great publicity, I wouldn't expect anything like a partnership announcement.

I think when they do announce their next partnership, it will be out of the blue, with no build up/conference hype, hopefully sometime in December. So I'm personally holding this month regardless of what happens. But don't get your hopes up about tomorrow specifically.

>>4909957
Why did you buy this out of curiosity?

>>4324507
I basically agree OP but you're mistake is in thinking BCH will be any better in the long run.

The best option will be for BTC to die a slow death as people transition to superior technologies not bogged down by the flaws that are fundamental to all iterations BTC. The attempt by Jihan and Ver to kill BTC overnight will have disastrous effects on the crypto market if it succeeds, any sensible person who is seriously invested in crypto should be against it.

>>4264020
It's a bunch of college grads trying to get rich off the ICO hype. Good for them, they've made me quite a bit of money.

The 3 devs own a third of the supply, and those tokens will be released as soon as they have an open beta (so before the product even goes to market). They have no interest in delivering a quality product, just the bare minimum to avoid a lawsuit. Their strategy to start with a low market cap was actually very smart, it makes it look like they're not greedy. But they own so much of the supply that they will make an absolute killing as soon as the funds are released, even if the market cap is still relatively low.

>b-but it was just a third party wallet guys!

You braindead faggots don't get it. This is a big deal because it exposes the fact that the nature of smart contracts makes ETH a horrifically terrible choice as a long term store of value. Most people with a brain knew this already, but 90% of ETH holders are normies who got into crypto a week ago.

Are we going to need a hard fork every time some incompetent developer writes an ill thought out smart contract? Smart contracts add an additional layer of complexity (ie an additional way for things to go wrong) that make ETH utterly impractical as a store of value, let alone a currency.

Payment confirmed.

Welcome to the millionaires club guys

>b-b-but Req and Airswap went below ICO price

Yeah because they had unsustainably high market caps immediately after ICO with nothing to back them up, and trillions of shittokens. No one is selling this gem below ICO price.